My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-09-08_REVISION - M2012032 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2012032
>
2020-09-08_REVISION - M2012032 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/28/2024 4:11:03 AM
Creation date
9/8/2020 9:31:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2012032
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
9/8/2020
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Ouray Silver Mines
To
DRMS
Email Name
LJW
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ouray Silver Mines, Inc. <br /> 1900 Main St.Unit 1 <br /> PO Box 564 <br /> `)uray,CO 81427 - <br /> CJLL'R.,AV S1Ll'ER NIANE <br /> September 2, 2020 Mr. Lucas West Q rw io,"""�V c D <br /> Environmental Protection Specialist r` <br /> Colorado Division of Reclamation Mining and Safety SLt <br /> 101 31d Street <br /> Grand Junction, CO 81501 I �wFE <br /> ` �?�1A- <br /> p1V1S n <br /> Subject: Technical Revision 11 Adequacy Review Response to Comments <br /> DRMS Permit No.M-2012-032 <br /> Revenue Mine, Ouray County,Colorado <br /> Dear Lucas, <br /> Ouray Silver Mines Inc. (OSMI)received your letter dated June 12, 2020 regarding the Division <br /> of Reclamation Mining and Safety's (DRMS)adequacy review of Technical Revision 11 (TR- <br /> 11)to the Section I I2d Designated Mining Operation(DMO)Permit No. M-2012-32. On July <br /> 13, 2020, OSMI received DRMS's second Adequacy Review letter regarding additional details <br /> required for bond calculations. The following letter provides responses to each of the items <br /> DRMS has identified in its June 12 and July 13 letters. Supporting documentation is provided in <br /> the attachments. <br /> We have organized the letter by DRMS's comments,which are restated in italic font followed by <br /> OSMI's response in regular font. <br /> 1. DRMS Comment:Section 2.2 Pilot Passive Treatment Materials Placement <br /> The volumes provided on Page 5 do not add up to the total volume stated on Page 6 of the <br /> revision. Approximately 29 Cubic Yards of material is listed on Page 5, however Page 6 states <br /> 25 Cubic Yards of material. Please clarify the total volume of material to be removed from the <br /> Pilot Passive Treatment Containers. Also, when updating the Reclamation Plan please clam <br /> the final placement location of that material. <br /> OSMI Response: The volumes of materials listed on page 5 equal the total capacity of each <br /> stage of the treatment system (which has total capacity of approximately 29 cubic yards). The <br /> volume of treatment materials used during the pilot testing phase was approximately 25 cubic <br /> yards, as listed on page 6. The discrepancy is the difference between the volume of the treatment <br /> system tanks and containers and the volume of treatment media that was placed in each tank and <br /> or container. <br /> Phone: (970)325-9830 ♦ Fax: (970)325-9824 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.