Laserfiche WebLink
pits. A sepr,-Irate item Wzls inselled into the Direct Costportioll of the IT 10 <br />-Appei.idlx A Suininary (J'able A-1), whiell includes the additional costs oftopsoil <br />p1acenieiit<,,uid revegetation for the entire 206.7 acres, 80.7 acres to be I'Lilly reclalitied <br />and 126.0 acres of'RNYBR. '"Flie swine unit costs and nicthodology used. f the C' <br />11"Ces <br />PR9 Bond. IYBR adjustii-ient was also employed hi the PR 10 cost adjustmell.t. "I'llc <br />revised PRI 0 Bond estimate is included. <br />Rule 4.09.1(7). Disposal of Excess Spoil <br />DRMS August 2020 <br />The Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety (DRMS), has reviewed Evaluation <br />and J Pit S z1fty &port bv A a 'to Aysoeiatev, Inc. dated. May 26, 20-19 for <br />poil Pile Stah * --g_pi <br />the Trapper Mine Permit Revision Pry -10. <br />4. In the Conclusion and Recommendations section of the report, the Operator states the <br />spoil piles will be constructed in small lifts (20-40 feet) to allow for better compaction <br />of the spoilparticles. Pursuant to Rule 4.09.1(7), please explain how the spoil piles <br />will be concurrently compacted to ensure mass stability and -prevent mass movement. <br />5. Please provide the Rockscience Inc. slope stability analysis data for the Agapito <br />Associates, Inc. geotechnical evaluation of the I and J Pits Spoil Piles to allow the <br />Division to duplicate the analysis with Clover Technology's Galena software for <br />verification purposes. Please include the profile geometries and the material <br />properties used in the stability analysis, preferably in paper and electronic forms. <br />Trapper Response to Comment 4: <br />The SPO -11 piles will be dumped in 20 -foot lifts for the most part with the large overburden trucks provid' .119 <br />the required compaction for the layers of f"ill. To sort the rock required for the underdrain taller dump faces <br />faces, <br />up to 40 feet tall, will be utilized to collect the rock. Even allowing for this tatler ffice, the con-ipaction <br />provided during this Process allows for safety factors above 1.75 at the worst case, exceeding the 1.5 <br />criterion. <br />Trapper Response to Comment 5- <br />The profile geometries are included separately as DX F files so that tlicy n -lay be opened as digital file s and <br />measurements taken from them. They are called A Section through D Section and their material properties <br />are included in'J'able 1, Summary Numerical Model Input Parameters, Page 4 of Agapito Associates, Inc. <br />report 'R.e.- Evaluation ofl- and J -Pit Spoil Pile Stability, Trapper Mine. <br />Rule 4.23.2 Auger Mining <br />DRMS August 2020 <br />DRMS notes that as per the above referenced rule, auger mining shall <br />maximize coal recoverability of remaining reserves after completion of <br />mining. DRi S finds that there may be areas of undisturbed coal left in <br />unmined sections that are in excess of 2500 feet apart. Given that the <br />ownership is the State of Colorado with a Trapper Lease, please <br />demonstrate: <br />6. Distances between centrolds of coal sections meet the requirements of <br />the above mentioned rule <br />7. That undisturbed areas of coal are a minimum of 250 feet wide between <br />