My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-08-07_REVISION - M1980244 (7)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2020-08-07_REVISION - M1980244 (7)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2024 11:57:29 PM
Creation date
8/13/2020 6:47:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
8/7/2020
Doc Name Note
Vol 1 of 2
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
CC&V
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM13
Email Name
TC1
JPL
ERR
BFB
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
NEWMONT <br /> GOLDCORP <br /> 4 GROUNDWATER GEOCHEMISTRY <br /> The groundwater hydrology and geochemistry of the District have been investigated since 1906 <br /> (Lindgren and Ransome, 1906). Detailed investigations of the groundwater hydrology and <br /> geochemistry have been conducted for permitting of Cresson Project extensions for Amendment <br /> 8 (Adrian Brown Consultants, 1998; Shepherd Miller Inc., 1998), MLE - Amendment 9, (Adrian <br /> Brown Consultants, 2008), and MLE2 - Amendment 10, (Adrian Brown Consultants, 2010), and <br /> Amendment 11 (Adrian Brown Consultants, 2015). The information provided as part of <br /> Amendment 11 remains current. The most recent update to the geochemical model was provided <br /> in Appendix 1 in Volume 11 of Amendment 11 (December 2015). <br /> The activities associated with Amendment 13 are not expected to affect the geochemistry of the <br /> site. Prior studies have evaluated the acid-generating potential and acid-neutralizing potential of <br /> sulfur oxidation of the rock mass within the District. Geochemical evaluations have been <br /> conducted on rock samples from drilling throughout the Cresson Project, from blast hole data, <br /> and from rock removed from the back and ribs of the Chicago Tunnel. These data are considered <br /> representative of the materials to be mined, stored at the surface or backfilled. The geochemical <br /> evaluations also have included an analysis of the reasonable sources, probable fate, and <br /> transport mechanisms of metal and acid-producing minerals that may be mobilized during <br /> development and reclamation of the Cresson Project. <br /> Using the hydrologic and geochemical information developed for the District, an evaluation was <br /> conducted of the fate and transport of water infiltrating to the subsurface through mines, mine <br /> backfill, and over burden storage areas (OSAs). The results of the analysis were verified by <br /> checking against the observed behavior of the hydraulics and chemistry of the diatreme since <br /> Cresson Project surface mining began in 1993, using the measured vertical hydraulic gradients <br /> in and near the diatreme, and the flow rate and chemistry of the regional groundwater exiting the <br /> Carlton Tunnel portal. The results of the analysis indicate that no deleterious change in the <br /> average regional groundwater quality from the District will occur due to past, current or proposed <br /> operations. <br /> Cripple Creek&Victor Gold Mining Company Exhibit G <br /> Cresson Project Amendment 13 <br /> 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.