My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-08-07_REVISION - M1980244 (9)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2020-08-07_REVISION - M1980244 (9)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2024 11:55:29 PM
Creation date
8/13/2020 6:45:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
8/7/2020
Doc Name Note
Vol 1 of 2
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
CC&V
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM13
Email Name
TC1
JPL
ERR
BFB
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
NEWMONT <br /> .('PQ _eK 3 i ., _r V i <br /> (Attachment 10). <br /> DBMS Comment(italics): <br /> 40. 1.5? Overburden Storage .Areas — Surface aline Bac ill.Areas. The .Applicant states portions of <br /> the.lain Cresson backfill will need to be reclaimed at(in approximate slope equivalent to the angle <br /> of repose. .-Ilso under the same section the .Applicant discusses backfilled portions of*the Alain <br /> Cresson will be placed at a 11:1 b"slope. In accordance with a prior commitment, please revise this <br /> to state that all backfilled portions will be graded to an overall slope o1*2.5H-I band if future plans <br /> indicate a steeper slope is required in some areas, a revision will be submitted to the Division for <br /> review and approval prior to steeping urn•portions of the slopes. <br /> Newmont Response: <br /> CC&V will maintain slopes at an overall 2.5H:1V for reclaimed areas. If future plans indicate a steeper <br /> slope is more beneficial for habitat creation in some areas, CC&V will submit a revised Reclamation Plan <br /> to the Division for review and approval prior to the steepening of any slopes. Exhibit D(Attachment 8) <br /> and Exhibit E (Attachment 10)have been revised accordingly. <br /> 6.4.6 EXHIBIT F—Reclamation Plan Map <br /> DBMS Comment(italics): <br /> 41. Exhibit F Contours. The maps appear to show an error in the topography contour lcn'er between <br /> the East Cresson aline (Wildhorse Extension), Ironclad Fac•iliti• (Ironclad), and orth Cresson <br /> .Hine (Globe Hill) areas. Please revise the Exhibit FAlaps to fix the merging contour lines. <br /> Newmont Response: <br /> Comment noted. The drawings provided in Exhibit F have been updated to correct the contours. See <br /> updated drawings in Attachment 9. <br /> DRMS Comment(italics): <br /> 42. Drawing F-I legtmd .Approximate Post alining Topography references a 6-foot chain link <br /> reclamation fencing above highwalls taller than 100 feet vertical. In accordance with a prior <br /> commitment,please revise this to reflect the wildlife closure,fence commitments regarding the height <br /> of'the fence and where fencing will be constructed. <br /> Newmont Response: <br /> Comment noted. The legend in Drawing F-1 has been updated to reflect the Post Mining Fence. The <br /> Reclamation Plan (Exhibit E)has been updated to define and describe the Post-Mining Fence. See the <br /> updated drawings in Attachment 9, and the updated Reclamation Plan in Attachment 10. <br /> DRMS Comment(italics): <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.