My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-07-28_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1980004
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1980004
>
2020-07-28_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1980004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/8/2025 6:27:13 AM
Creation date
7/29/2020 9:16:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980004
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
7/28/2020
Doc Name Note
Case No. 20-12043 (GRH) Hopedale Mining LLC
Doc Name
Bankruptcy Notice
From
E11 USCpiq Corporate Restructuring, LLC
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
JRS
JDM
GRM
CMM
CCW
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case 1:20-bk-12043 Doc 108 Filed 07/27/20 Entered 07/27/20 15,09:40 Desc Main <br /> Document Page 11 of 13 <br /> H. In addition, the Debtors seek approval of the Engagement Letter pursuant to <br /> section 328(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, which provides, in relevant part, that the Debtors "with <br /> the court's approval, may employ or authorize the employment of a professional person under <br /> section 327. . . on any reasonable terms and conditions of employment, including on a retainer, on <br /> an hourly basis, on a fixed or percentage fee basis, or on a contingent fee basis." Section 328 of <br /> the Bankruptcy Code permits the compensation of professionals, including sale and financial <br /> advisors, on more flexible terms that reflect the nature of their services and market conditions. As <br /> the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recognized in Donaldson Lain&Jenrette <br /> Sec. Corp. v. Nat'l Gypsum Co. (In re Nat'l Gypsum Co.), 123 F.3d 861 (5th Cir. 1997): <br /> Prior to 1978 the most able professionals were often unwilling to work for <br /> bankruptcy estates where their compensation would be subject to the uncertainties <br /> of what a judge thought the work was worth after it had been done. That uncertainty <br /> continues under the present § 330 of the Bankruptcy Code, which provides that the <br /> court award to professional consultants "reasonable compensation" based on <br /> relevant factors of time and comparable costs, etc. Under present § 328 the <br /> professional may avoid that uncertainty by obtaining court approval of <br /> compensation agreed to with the trustee (or debtor or committee). <br /> Id. at 862 (citations omitted), cited in Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland& Perretti LLP v. Official <br /> Comm. of Unsecured Creditors (In re Stuart World Techs. LLC), 383 B.R. 869, 874 (S.D.N.Y. <br /> 2008). Owing to this inherent uncertainty, courts have approved similar arrangements that contain <br /> reasonable terms and conditions under section 328 of the Bankruptcy Code. See, e.g., In re <br /> Chaparral Energy, Inc., No. 16-11144 (Bankr. D. Del. June 10, 2016); In re Energy & Exp. <br /> Partners, Inc., No. 15-44931 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Feb. 8, 2016). Furthermore, the Bankruptcy <br /> Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 amended section 328(a) of the <br /> Bankruptcy Code by inserting "on a fixed or percentage fee basis," after "hourly basis," as cited <br /> above. This change makes clear that the Debtors are able to retain a professional on a fixed or <br /> percentage fee basis, such as the Fee and Expense Structure, with bankruptcy court approval. <br /> 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.