Laserfiche WebLink
WNrjkTCT-CUVK- <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />125 North Spruce Street <br />Grand Junction Coloroo 8 <br />Plaintiff -Counterclaim Defendant: RUDOLPH <br />FONTANARI, JR., AND ETHEL CAROL FONTANARI, <br />TRUSTEES OF THE RUDOLPH AND ETHEL CAROL <br />FONTANARI REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST, <br />V. <br />Defendants: SNOWCAP COAL COMPANY, INC., et al., <br />V. <br />Third -Party Defendants: RUDOLPH FONTANARI, JR., <br />et al. <br />DA [+ UILVD, Ma) 29, 2018 9,27 A <br />HIAN(i ID: 998CMBAH9911- <br />CASU NUMBI-A: 2017CV30314 <br />COURT USE ONLY <br />Case Number: 2017CV30314 <br />Division <br />Plaintiffs, Rudolph Fontanari, Jr. and Ethel Carol Fontanari, as Trustees of the Rudolph <br />and Ethel Carol Fontanari Revocable Trust, Rudolph Fontanari, Jr. and Ethel Cam] Fontanari in <br />their individual capacities, and Defendant, Snowcap Coal Company, Inc., by their respective <br />counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: <br />Plaintiff's and Defendant Snowcap agree that a stay of proceedings in the instant <br />civil action during the pendency of the related action for judicial review, case no. 2017CV30391, <br />Mesa County District Court ("Judicial Review Action"'), will promote judicial economy and <br />conserve the resources of both this Court and the parties, including the Colorado Office of the <br />Attorney General. "Courts, in general, have the power to stay proceedings before them." Town <br />of Minturn v. Sensible Hous. Co., 2012 CO 23, $ 18 (citing Landis v. ff Amer. Co., 299 U.S. <br />248, 254-55 (1936)). "The power to stay proceedings is incidental to the power inherent in every <br />FONTANARI EXHIBIT 4 <br />DRMS Dkt. #SI,4 1 <br />