Laserfiche WebLink
Environmental Assessment <br /> No. Alternative Description Source of <br /> Alternative J. <br /> 9 Aerial Tram/Conveyor Little detail was provided in the scoping comment. For Public Comment <br /> the purpose of consideration of an aerial tram or (Danielson) <br /> elevated conveyor; it is assumed that the alignment <br /> would follow that of alternatives 6, 7, and 8. <br /> 10 Slurry Pipeline Little detail was provided in the scoping comment. For Public Comment <br /> the purpose of consideration of constructing a pipeline (Danielson) <br /> to slurry convey coal; it is assumed that the alignment <br /> would follow that of alternatives 6, 7, and 8. <br /> As stated above,when considering alternatives to be carried through in a NEPA analysis,the alternatives <br /> must, among other criteria,meet the project purpose and need;be technically and economically feasible; <br /> and its implementation must not be remote or speculative. <br /> 2.3.3 Alternatives Eliminated Following Initial Screening <br /> Of the ten transportation alternatives identified through scoping, four alternatives were initially screened <br /> and subsequently eliminated from future detailed consideration and analysis in the EA. A summary <br /> description of each of the alternatives follows, along with the pros and cons identified and considered, and <br /> the rationale for eliminating from detailed analysis in this EA. <br /> Alternative 1 —New North Bound Haul Road <br /> This option would involve the construction of a dedicated haul road north to a new intersection with U.S. <br /> Highway 160. The roadway would be approximately 8 miles in length. This option was reviewed as a <br /> coal hauling alternative route that would eliminate the impacts to residents along CR 120 and CR 119. It <br /> would also reduce coal truck traffic along SH 140. The land north of the King II Mine to U.S. Highway <br /> 160 is forested ponderosa pine and spruce/fir woodlands at the higher elevations and pinon juniper and <br /> Gambel oak at lower elevations. The King II Mine is at 7,200 feet in elevation. The terrain extending to <br /> the north is characterized by steep slopes climbing in elevation to approximately 8,500 feet before <br /> descending back down to U.S. Highway 160. The area is remote, largely undisturbed land with excellent <br /> wildlife and scenic values. Some of the canyons in this area contain suitable habitat for the Mexican <br /> spotted owl, a federally threatened species, although there are no owl occurrence records from the <br /> immediate area(refer to Section 3.10 Threatened, Endangered and Sensitive Species). There is a small <br /> network of primitive roads and/or 2-tracks that are likely used for hunting by area landowners. The land is <br /> mostly private all the way to the highway(minimum of eight private land parcels would be crossed). The <br /> access onto U.S. Highway 160 would be in the immediate vicinity of the Hesperus Ski Area creating a <br /> safety concern and impacts to the recreation experience. Once on U.S. Highway 160, coal trucks would <br /> need to travel westbound to U.S. Highway 491, either through the Cortez business district or via a newly <br /> constructed bypass. <br /> The reasons for eliminating this alternative include the following: <br /> DOI-B LM-CO-S010-2011-0074-EA <br /> September 2017 <br /> -53- <br />