My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-06-25_REVISION - C1981035 (35)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981035
>
2020-06-25_REVISION - C1981035 (35)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2025 2:23:47 AM
Creation date
6/24/2020 5:15:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981035
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/25/2020
Doc Name Note
King II App 18 Lease Mod Final
Doc Name
Proposed Revision Materials
From
GCC Energy, LLC
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
PR10
Email Name
JHB
THM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
303
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Environmental Assessment <br /> 2.3.1 Leasing and Mining Alternatives <br /> The original submission for the lease modification submitted to the BLM in March 2012 included a Tract <br /> C that was removed by GCC in October 2014 because timing and coal quality issues would make it <br /> inaccessible from the active workings of the King II Mine. GCC requested that Tract A be modified to <br /> include additional acreage to replace the acreage removed. The result was the final lease modification <br /> being evaluated in this EA. <br /> Potential alternative methods for mining the coal reserves in the lease modification area identified by <br /> GCC were either determined to be technologically unsuited to the topography and character of the coal <br /> seam (as underground long-wall mining requires significantly wide deposits [0.25 to 1.0 mile] of nearly <br /> uniform coal seams of a given height and character), or would result in significantly greater <br /> environmental disturbance (including open pit,contour, or other surface mining methods). <br /> 2.3.2 Coal Transportation Alternatives <br /> Alternative coal transport options have been considered and analyzed by the BLM and the OSMRE and <br /> by the cooperating agencies—particularly LPC—since July 2012 when GCC submitted a Class II LUP <br /> application to LPC. During this time,there was also substantial input from GCC,the public, and a variety <br /> of expert witnesses as the LPC Planning process presented a platform for the exchange of ideas and <br /> debate. In 2014 Roadrunner Engineering, LLC,under contract to GCC,prepared a TIA. The TIA was an <br /> integral part of the LPC planning process and was revised/updated in July 2015 and again in November <br /> 2015 as directed by LPC or was necessary to respond to new information presented by the public during <br /> the LPC LUP review process. The TIA evaluated baseline traffic values and projected traffic volumes 20 <br /> years into the future using LPC data. The TIA also evaluated project area accident records,traffic <br /> volumes and loading, speed limits and sight distances,design criteria, and included an assessment of <br /> alternative haul road option assessment. The TIA is publicly available on the LPC Planning Department <br /> website under the GCC Energy Project link at: http://Ipccds.org/UserFiles/Servers/Server_1323669/File <br /> /La%20Plata%20Coun1y's%20Communi1y%20Development%20 Service s%20Department%20Migration/ <br /> Planning/Oil%20and%20Gas/GCC%20Energy%20Proj ect/1%20-%20GCC%20Energy%20Kin% <br /> %20TIA%20-Final%20151119.pdf. <br /> The TIA performed an assessment of eight different haul route options to move coal product from the <br /> mine to SH 140. In addition to the transportation alternatives evaluated in the TIA and considered by <br /> LPC,there were variations of the TIA alternatives and new alternatives presented by the public and/or via <br /> expert testimony that frame the consideration of alternative coal transportation in this EA. These <br /> transportation alternatives, listed in Table 2-6,were the focus of 4 years of detailed LPC Planning <br /> Commission and Board of County Commissioners evaluation whereas 96 technical and/or communication <br /> exhibits were generated throughout the public participation and decision-making process. <br /> DOI-BLM-CO-S010-2011-0074-EA <br /> September 2017 <br /> -51- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.