My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-06-08_REVISION - C1982057 (31)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1982057
>
2020-06-08_REVISION - C1982057 (31)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2024 8:35:30 PM
Creation date
6/11/2020 5:38:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/8/2020
Doc Name Note
Phase II Bond Release Request Narrative
Doc Name
Initial Application Materials
From
Seneca Property, LLC
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
SL7
Email Name
RAR
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
concentrations downstream of the mine were conservatively estimated and no significant impacts to <br /> adjacent Alluvial Valley Floors were predicted. Post mine TDS concentrations support these predictions <br /> as TDS contributions remained below predicted values within the Dry Creek watershed. Furthermore, <br /> contributions from mining did not exceed the pre-mine downstream TDS concentrations in Dry Creek <br /> which were attributed to dry land farming in the watershed. The predicted post mine TDS concentration <br /> for Sage Creek was less than the recently measured concentrations. However,the prediction in the Seneca <br /> II-W permit was made prior to the development of the Yoast Mine which also contributes to this stream. <br /> The post mine concentrations remain well below the projected increases as described in the Yoast Mine <br /> PHC (see Tab 17 Permit C-1994-082). Therefore, it is unlikely that the contributions from Seneca II-W <br /> have been significant. <br /> Impacts from runoff of the reclaimed mine areas and sediment ponds were projected to be of minimal <br /> significance. This is in agreement with the water quality observed in the receiving stream and at the <br /> NPDES outfalls (see Section B and C above). <br /> G. Completion of the Hydrologic Reclamation Plan <br /> Seneca II-W has been reclaimed utilizing the approved practices and measures described within the <br /> C-1982-057 permit. The final remaining measure within Hydrologic Reclamation Plan to be addressed is <br /> the abandonment of the thirty-four remaining monitoring wells within or adjacent to the requested Phase <br /> III bond release area. Thirteen are located in the alluvium, six within the Wadge Coal seam, six within the <br /> Wadge Overburden, three within the Wolf Creek Coal, one with the Wolf Creek Coal Overburden, one <br /> within the Wolf Creek Underburden, one within the Sage Creek Coal, one within the Sage Creek <br /> Overburden, and two within the Trout Creek Sandstone (see Table 3 of the Seneca II-W Annual <br /> Hydrology Report for the list wells and their construction details). All thirty-four remaining wells will be <br /> removed using well abandonment procedures approved by the CDRMS upon approval of this bond release <br /> application. <br /> As described in above in Part A and in previously approved Technical Revision 63, alluvial well <br /> DCAL-02 is the only groundwater point of compliance(GWPOC)well for the Seneca II West Mine. The <br /> well is screened within the Dry Creek Alluvium and is located downgradient(north) of the mines permit <br /> boundary. A GWPOC for the Sage Creek Alluvium was deemed unnecessary due to the small portion of <br /> the ridgeline that was mined within the Sage Creek watershed. GWPOC bedrock wells were also deemed <br /> unnecessary based on the absence of the potential for the mine to negatively impact the quality of bedrock <br /> groundwater. See Part A above and TR-63 in Appendix 15-B of the Seneca II-W permit for additional <br /> justification. <br /> The groundwater quality at GWPOC well DCAL-02 meets all existing water quality standards except for <br /> dissolved iron. Over the last five years the dissolved iron has ranged from 0.14 — 10. 8 mg/L (mean: 6.74 <br /> mg/L) and is above the 8.06 mg/L standard established in TR-63. DCAL-02 has exhibited elevated iron <br /> since it was installed in 1998. No other groundwater quality standard has been exceeded and it is probable <br /> that the dissolved iron is the ambient background concentration for this area. <br /> In 2018 water levels at all monitored bedrock and alluvial wells were within historic ranges. A cursory <br /> review indicates the water levels remain within the historic range in 2019 as well. Additional evaluation <br /> 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.