My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-06-08_REVISION - C1982057 (31)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1982057
>
2020-06-08_REVISION - C1982057 (31)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2024 8:35:30 PM
Creation date
6/11/2020 5:38:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/8/2020
Doc Name Note
Phase II Bond Release Request Narrative
Doc Name
Initial Application Materials
From
Seneca Property, LLC
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
SL7
Email Name
RAR
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
final predicted TDS concentration of 1787 mg/L at WSH7 (SW-S2W-SG7) and 2451 mg/L at WSD5 <br /> (SW-S2W-SG5). The projected increase within Sage Creek at WSSF3 (SW-S2W-FG4)was lower at 12% <br /> (64 mg/L) and resulted in a predicted concentration of 676 mg/L. The evaluation concluded that the <br /> quality of the surface water supplying the AVF's would not be impacted to such an extent that the water <br /> uses (irrigation and stock water)would be prohibited or degraded to the point of material damage. <br /> This conclusion is supported by the post mine surface water quality at the sample locations within Dry <br /> Creek watershed. Hubberson Gulch drains through the 26 acres AVF located approximately a quarter mile <br /> southeast of the confluence of Hubberson Gulch and Water Trough Gulch (Section 16 and 21, T5N, <br /> R88W). The fields are flood irrigated with Hubberson Gulch water from just upstream of sample point <br /> WSH7 (SW-S2W-SG7). The average TDS concentration over the last five years at WSH7 <br /> (SW-S2W-SG7)is 1125 mg/L which is approximately 600 mg/L lower than the predicted 1787 mg/L TDS <br /> concentration specified in the Probable Hydrologic Consequences analysis. Lower than predicted TDS <br /> concentrations were also observed further downstream at WSD5 within Dry Creek where the 1710 mg/L <br /> five-year TDS average has been approximately 700 mg/L lower than the predicted 2451 mg/L <br /> concentration. These concentrations are significantly lower than the 3567 mg/L pre-mine TDS <br /> concentrations measured lower in the watershed at the southwest corner of Section 22, Township 6N, <br /> Range 88W. This elevated TDS was attributed to soil salt accumulations from dry land farming in the <br /> watershed that are dissolved and transported to the primary drainages. <br /> The Sage Creek flood irrigated AVF,located in Section 30, T6N,R87W,receives spoil contributions from <br /> both Seneca II-W and Yoast Mine. Although the 970 mg/L five year average TDS concentration measured <br /> at nearby stream point WSSF3 (SW-S2W-FG4) exceeds the predicted TDS concentration of 676 mg/L <br /> included in the Seneca 11-W permit it is still approximately 1100 mg/L less than the 2118 mg/L post mine <br /> concentration predicted in the Yoast Mine PHC(see Tab 17 of Permit C-1994-082). The Yoast Mine PHC <br /> concluded that the impact from the increased TDS concentrations in Sage Creek would not have a <br /> significant impact in regard to the potential use of the surface water for flood irrigation. Therefore the <br /> elevated TDS at point WSSF3 relative to the earlier projected post mine concentrations detailed in the <br /> Seneca 11-W PHC do not appear to have impacted the AVE <br /> F. Agreement of Observed Hydrologic Impacts with the "Probable Hydrologic <br /> Consequences"(PHC)Projected in the Mining Permit <br /> The Observed Hydrologic Impacts are generally in good agreement with the Probable Hydrologic <br /> Consequences projected in the mine permit. The pre-mine groundwater was marginal to unsuitable for <br /> stock and/or irrigation. A single residential well was identified within the mining area and was mitigated <br /> per legal agreement. No other residential wells were located within or adjacent to the mine area. Water <br /> quality at compliance well DCAL-02 meets all applicable water quality standards except for dissolved <br /> iron. As described in Section A above it is likely that the elevated dissolved iron is actually representative <br /> of the ambient background concentrations within the Dry Creek Alluvium and is not indicative of offsite <br /> impact to the local groundwater system. Compliance bedrock wells were deemed unnecessary due to the <br /> limited potential for the mine to negatively impact the quality of bedrock groundwater(see Section A and <br /> Technical Revision 63). Therefore, as predicted in the PHC no groundwater users were impacted. Impacts <br /> of spoil water to the primary drainages were described in detail in Part E. Spoil water contributions to TDS <br /> 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.