Laserfiche WebLink
ENVIRONMENT, INC. PAGE 7 <br /> L.G. EVERIST, INC. - RAGSDALE RESERVOIR ADEQUACY RESPONSE ❑1 <br /> MAY 6, 2020 <br /> The reclamation plan maps state that if the backfilled areas are <br /> not reclaimed to approximate original grade for cropland, they <br /> will be backfilled to at least two feet above groundwater and <br /> reclaimed as rangeland. The provision for reclamation as range- <br /> land is not found in the text of the reclamation plan. Please <br /> edit as needed for consistency. <br /> I have changed the notes on the Reclamation Maps to remove the "as rangeland". <br /> The owners plan to use the backfilled areas for agriculture crops no matter how full <br /> they are filled. <br /> EXHIBIT G - Water Information (Rule 6.4.7) : <br /> Rule 3 . 6 . 1 (1) of the Minerals Rules and Regulations of the <br /> Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board for the Extraction of <br /> Construction Materials states : "Disturbances to the prevailing <br /> hydrologic balance of the affected land and of the surrounding <br /> area and to the quantity or quality of water in surface and <br /> groundwater systems both during and after the mining operation <br /> and during reclamation shall be minimized..." To address these <br /> concerns, a Groundwater Mitigation Plan was provided by the <br /> operator to supplement the required information provided for <br /> Exhibit G. After reviewing the provided information DRMS has the <br /> following comments and additional requirements . <br /> In the first paragraph of the "Mitigation Trigger" section, the <br /> last sentence states that mining will start in unlined areas, <br /> however Phases 1 and 2 are shown to be slurry wall lined, so this <br /> statement is a bit unclear. Please revise as needed. Please also <br /> acknowledge that DRMS requires a minimum of five quarters of <br /> groundwater level monitoring prior to dewatering or groundwater <br /> exposure at the site . <br /> I have made a minor revision to the wording in the paragraph you are referring to <br /> above, to make it clear what is proposed and I have revised Exhibit G for the record. <br /> Mining will start in Phase 1-A, the first unlined area. The material will be moved to <br /> Phase 3 for storage and processing. Monitoring began in October 2019, so by <br /> January 2021 we will have 5 quarters of data available. The groundwater levels in <br /> MW#1 are currently an average of 17.5 feet below the surface, so Mining can begin <br /> if needed on Phase 1A in the gravel that lies 2 feet above the water table until the 5 <br /> quarters have been collected to avoid exposing ground water. <br /> Some nearby wells referred to in Table G-1 (Permits 195505, <br /> 38703 , and 25007-F-R) are not shown on the provided figure for <br /> G-1 or Exhibit C existing conditions/structures . Please add these <br /> wells or explain why they aren' t relevant . <br /> Thank you for finding those inconsistencies. I have spent time reviewing the well list <br /> again and have found that there were some corrections that needed to be made. All <br /> the details are listed below, in answer to your comment (2nd down from here) which <br /> starts, "DRMS acknowledges the difficulty in establishing...." <br />