Laserfiche WebLink
RULE 2 PERMITS <br /> Within the post-mining vegetative community,seeded shrubs will supply the necessary <br /> requirements for nesting cover. <br /> Within the literature no specific location of nests seem to be indicated other than a <br /> preference for less dense and shorter shrubs which seem to indicate a need for quick escape <br /> should the hen be flushed unexpectedly. The density and structures of the shrub component <br /> within the post-mine community should provide the diversity of cover and density suited <br /> to sagegrouse nesting. <br /> Within the pre-mine vegetative community, insects and succulent vegetation provide <br /> the majority of the food for the developing chicks. As these food sources mature and dry, <br /> the grouse will move to areas still supporting succulent vegetation. These sites include <br /> springs, seeps, drainage bottoms and water impoundments. During the late summer and <br /> fall months,the important food plants dry up on the upland slopes and the grouse will tend <br /> to remain closer to available watering areas where some succulent vegetation is still <br /> available. Many of the grouse are then observed in the alfalfa and irrigated meadowlands <br /> on areas around the mining area. <br /> Within the post-mine vegetative community,the food component for brood rearing will <br /> be provided by insects and succulent vegetation on reclaimed areas early in chick <br /> development. Later into the summer months, as food sources dry up on the upland slopes, <br /> food will be available near water impoundments and drainage bottoms being returned to <br /> the post-mining topography. The literature indicates no optimum distance between nesting <br /> sites and food sources. Evidently, the location of nesting sites are independent of food <br /> sources, rather, the nesting locations are based on available cover, and the grouse <br /> movements are tied to the availability of succulent vegetation. <br /> For the most part, the mitigation measures indicated above had the desired impact of <br /> improving conditions for sage grouse on undisturbed areas under Colowyo control. To the <br /> contrary, original reclamation plan measures did not result in a sagebrush component <br /> consistent with the original projections in many areas of the mine, especially the old <br /> reclaimed units that were revegetated with"introduced"pasture grasses. Beginning in the <br /> late 1990s and as evident in revegetated units that have been seeded since then, the <br /> sagebrush component of reclamation has improved substantially, but is still not up to <br /> original expectations. Therefore, substantial changes to the reclamation plan have been <br /> introduced in this submittal to hopefully,make another quantum leap forward in the ability <br /> to establish sagebrush steppe communities. Many changes in techniques have been <br /> proffered including variable topsoil depths, significantly increased amounts of the <br /> appropriate sagebrush seed,proper planting techniques to encourage sagebrush,etc. Given <br /> success of these techniques elsewhere in the mining industry, the potential is strong that <br /> the original projections for sagebrush establishment at Colowyo will be realized from this <br /> point forward. <br /> Additional Mitigation Measures <br /> The pre-planning for a minimum amount of annual disturbance, the establishment of herbaceous <br /> Rule 2 Permits 2.05-46 Revision Date: 12/20/19 <br /> Revision No.: TR-135 <br />