My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-03-24_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (39)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2020-03-24_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (39)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2021 8:30:09 AM
Creation date
5/11/2020 4:09:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/24/2020
Type & Sequence
TR135
Section_Exhibit Name
2.05 Operations and Reclamation Plans
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RULE 2 PERMITS <br /> 1. From 1976 until 1979 all livestock grazing was stopped in order to allow the range to <br /> rest and to return to a more productive state. The immediate benefit to sagegrouse was <br /> the increased production of herbaceous vegetation which, along with insects, is an <br /> important component to the sagegrouse brood population diet. A secondary benefit was <br /> the end of any nest trampling and end of disturbance and heavy grazing around <br /> watering areas due to livestock grazing. <br /> 2. During 1976 a fence was constructed around the Federal coal lease which eliminated <br /> all further livestock grazing in this area. Since 1976 to the present, sagegrouse have <br /> continued to benefit as described as#1 above. <br /> 3. All other areas outside of the lease fence(approximately 6,000 acres)have been grazed <br /> since 1979 at 60% of carrying capacity. This rate would allow for an increased <br /> sagegrouse brood population over that which the area supported in an overgrazed <br /> condition. <br /> 4. Since 1976,numerous areas of thick, decadent stands of the mountain shrub vegetation <br /> within and adjacent to the lease area have been cleared of brush as part of the big game <br /> mitigation program. As a result of the brushing,the production of succulent herbaceous <br /> vegetation has increased, offering more forage for the sage grouse brood population. <br /> The above changes in Management practices of the rangeland around the Colowyo <br /> mining area contribute to the increased capability of supporting any displaced sage <br /> grouse nesting and brooding population. No additional treatments to mitigate for a <br /> displaced sage grouse population are in effect, nor would other methods likely be as <br /> effective. <br /> II. Post-mining Mitigation for Sagegrouse <br /> As stated in the Permit Application, sage grouse use of the area to be mined is for <br /> nesting and brood rearing purposes. <br /> According to information contained within the Bureau of Land Management Technical <br /> Note#330, "Habitat Requirements and Management Recommendations for Sage Grouse," <br /> the most important factor for nesting habitat in the sagebrush vegetation type is sagebrush. <br /> Within this vegetative community, the majority of sage grouse nests occur under <br /> sagebrush. It is assumed that within the mountain shrub vegetative community, sage <br /> grouse nest would be found under the mountain shrub components as well as sagebrush. <br /> The most important factor for brooding habitat is the availability of the appropriate <br /> foods for the chicks. Also, during the later summer months of brood rearing, the <br /> availability of water becomes important. <br /> Within the pre-mine vegetative community, the nesting cover component is assumed <br /> to be sagebrush as well as other elements of the mountain shrub community. <br /> Rule 2 Permits 2.05-45 Revision Date: 12/20/19 <br /> Revision No.: TR-135 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.