Laserfiche WebLink
Forrest Luke <br /> Page 5 of 5 <br /> 2020 January <br /> Deacon 91 Deacon 92 Deal #2 Jeffway#1 <br /> DRMS, in review of the above mentioned sediment ponds as built information, specifically <br /> tables 4.8-6 and 4.8-7 notes that the storage capacity changed (decreased), other design <br /> parameters also changed from those proposed in PR8. DRMS has the following questions <br /> related to these four ponds, the updated tables submitted. <br /> February 2020 DBMS: <br /> 10. Please explain the various changes to the design parameters in tables 4.8-6 and 4.8-7. <br /> 11. Please specifically address the storage capacity decreases noted by DRMS in the <br /> associated table as mentioned above.. <br /> 12. If any ponds were relocated from the proposed location to a new location, please update <br /> the associated maps, Map M51. <br /> 13. If appropriate, due to the design changes from the proposed pond designs, please submit <br /> SEDCAD modeling in accordance with rules 4.05.2, 4.05.3, 4.05.4 and 4.05.9. <br /> Rule 4.05.11: Groundwater Protection <br /> 2020 February DBMS: Please see adequacy question#3 above. <br /> Rule: 4.14.2 General Grading <br /> 2020 February DBMS: DRMS finds the submitted revised pages, and Trappers' Permit adequately <br /> address this rule. <br /> Rule: 4.23.2 Auger Mining <br /> February 2020 DBMS: DRMS notes that no description of the auger mining process was presented <br /> in the revised pages of the application. Such a description would include leaving periodic spaces <br /> of undisturbed coal. <br /> 14. Please address this topic as per the above Rule if it is relevant to Trapper's mining <br /> scenario. <br />