My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-02-07_REVISION - M1977211 (15)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977211
>
2020-02-07_REVISION - M1977211 (15)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2025 3:36:02 AM
Creation date
2/10/2020 8:31:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977211
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
2/7/2020
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Continental Materials Corp.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM4
Email Name
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
UKCONTINENTAL MATERIALS CORPORATION <br /> Exhibit G-1. Furthermore, both armored ditches presented in Exhibits G-2a and G-2b have bottom <br /> widths varying from 10 to 20 feet which is also not delineated on Exhibit G-1. Given the potential critical <br /> nature of these stormwater ditches,the DRMS deems it necessary to evaluate the hydraulic <br /> performance of these ditches. Please provide the following: <br /> a. Freeboard clarification: Page G-6, last paragraph states the minimum freeboard is 0.5 feet.The same <br /> paragraph references Figure G-2 (which should be Figures G-2a and 2b). Figures G-2a and 2b indicate all <br /> channels will have one foot of freeboard. Please clarify the intended design freeboard [for steep <br /> channels, 1 ft is preferable]. <br /> Response: The channel depths have been revised to maintain a minimum freeboard of one-foot. <br /> b.Table G-3: Several channels appear to have varying longitudinal slopes(e.g.,the ditch conveying flows <br /> from the design point of WS8 to the Design point of WS9 appears to have four different gradients, and <br /> WS3 appears flatter at the top/west end and at the bottom near it's outlet). Please provide design <br /> calculation summaries for both the minimum and maximum gradients for each of the channel and <br /> culvert summaries(see Comment No. 33.d.iv below). <br /> Response: The channel design summaries are in Table G-3.The table lists a variety of channel slopes <br /> and specifies the minimum riprap armoring and channel size to safely convey the peak flow from the <br /> 100-yr, 24-hr storm event. <br /> c. Channel Transition Design:The hydraulic performance at the intersection of the WS-3 Cross Channel <br /> and south flowing terrace channel is of concern to the DRMS. Higher flows and velocity in the cross <br /> channel may cause interference/backwater/reverse flow conditions in the terrace channel at these <br /> junctions, leading to overtopping and/or potential for significant erosion and significant water <br /> infiltration. Please provide design details for these critical junctions. <br /> Response: The intersection of the cross-channel from WS-3, flow from WS-4, and flow from the terrace <br /> occurs on native ground that is outside the slide area.This is the location of the existing culvert, and the <br /> combined channels will be flat across the culvert area, which will prevent backwater in the cross- <br /> channel or terrace. It also allows the three flows to combine and dissipate energy before flowing down <br /> the riprap armored channel. <br /> d. Exhibit G-1 with the following: <br /> i. Larger scale in order to delineate the locations and reaches(i.e., ditches listed in Table G-3)of the <br /> three different ditch types and a means to specify the bottom design width of the two armored ditch <br /> types, <br /> Response: Exhibit G-1 has been provided at a larger scale. <br /> Pikeview Quarry Amendment 4, Response to Adequacy <br /> February 7, 2020 <br /> 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.