My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-02-06_PERMIT FILE - M2019046 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2019046
>
2020-02-06_PERMIT FILE - M2019046 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2024 5:03:44 PM
Creation date
2/6/2020 12:30:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2019046
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
2/6/2020
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response #2
From
Greg Lewicki And Associates, PLLC
To
Vicki Koepsel
Email Name
JPL
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the catch benches will no longer be cleared and maintained and will be allowed to return to the <br /> conditions of the surrounding landscape. See the attached revised narrative on page E-10 of the <br /> DBMS 112c permit application package dated January 20, 2020 (E-11 is all included as page <br /> spacing changed)and titled `DRMS I I2c Bradford Mesa Quarry 200205 Adequacy Response #2 <br /> pages E-10 and E-1 Lpdf.' <br /> Exhibit F—Reclamation Plan Map (Rule 6.4.6) <br /> 3. Please review the contour labelled 6050 that is in the middle left of the map, it appears <br /> that it is mislabeled. Please submit a revised map if the contour has been mislabeled. <br /> Map F-1 Reclamation Plan was revised, and the typographical error was removed. This revised <br /> map F-1 is included with this submission, see `Bradford Mesa 200205-F-1 Reclamation <br /> Plan.pdf.' <br /> Exhibit L—Reclamation Costs (Rule 6.4.12) <br /> 4. Please provide an explanation as to why the Division would not be required to blast the <br /> highwalls to achieve the proposed reclamation slope of 3H:1 V. <br /> The maximum 300-foot active highwall may require blasting to create a 3H:1 V slope, where <br /> needed. In the worst-case scenario, 6,666 CY of material will need to be drilled and shot with <br /> various depths to create a final 3H:1 V slope and is estimated at$3.00 CY cost resulting in a <br /> worst case scenario blasting cost of$19,998.00. Figure 14 details the various depths of drilling to <br /> be used to create a final 3H:1 V slope. See the attached revised Exhibit L Worst Case <br /> Reclamation Scenario on pages L-1 and L-2 of the DRMS 112c permit application package dated <br /> January 20, 2020 and titled `DRMS I I2c Bradford Mesa Quarry 200205 Adequacy Response#2 <br /> Exhibit L.pdf.' <br /> Rule 6.5—Geotechnical Stability Exhibit <br /> 5. Blasting Plan, Section 5 Dates and Times of Blasting,page 12. In the second paragraph, <br /> second sentence incorrectly references Section 5—Noticing of Blasting where Noticing of <br /> Blasting is in Section 6. Please update with the corrected information. <br /> Page 12, Section 5 Dates and Times of Blasting is now revised from its previous typographical <br /> error and is included with this submission, see `Appendix 3 - Bradford Mesa Quarry Preliminary <br /> Blast Plan 200205 page 12.pdf.' <br /> Other Permits and Licenses (Rule 6.3.6) <br /> 6. Pursuant to Rule 1.6.2(2),please demonstrate that the Applicant's response to these <br /> adequacy issues have been placed with the application materials previously placed with <br /> the County Clerk or Recorders Office, and made available for public review. <br /> Bradford Mesa—Adequacy Response #2 2 ,,»,;- - -; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.