Laserfiche WebLink
Fwrl // r w <br /> r <br /> yr/ <br /> r <br /> .41 <br /> Figure 20. Additional boom deployment in Yule Creek. Photo from October 30, 2019; <br /> view to the north. <br /> Also, on Wednesday, an HRL sampling technician collected water samples from the sump, <br /> directly north of the berm at the location that diesel was smelled and organics were <br /> observed, and at two locations further north and down gradient of the sump within Yule <br /> Creek (see HRL sampling map, point DG4 and DG5, Appendix E). The HRL <br /> representative noted that that potential diesel impact may have occurred based on the <br /> smell and the sheen seen on pooling water downstream of the sump, but that confirmation <br /> would be based on the final sample results. All water samples collected within Yule <br /> Creek, however, yielded non-detect diesel range organic (DRO) values; therefore, no <br /> diesel impact occurred to Yule Creek. <br /> Mitigation efforts on Wednesday were centered on transporting water from the storage <br /> tanks along the haul road down to the loadout. A total of 4 frac tanks were in place by <br /> midday on Wednesday and were capable of holding a total of 80,000 gallons of water. <br /> Two tanker trucks were transported up to the tanks by the regular CSQ contracted truck <br /> operators — Girardi's Towing, Inc. — and were filled with water direct from the sump. <br /> This was an attempt to draw down the sump level which was at —6 feet and totaling <6,000 <br /> gallons. Throughout the day, two water trucks ran laps from the onsite tanks down to the <br /> 28 <br />