My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019-10-10_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981010
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2019-10-10_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2024 1:11:30 PM
Creation date
10/15/2019 10:20:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
10/10/2019
From
DRMS
To
Trapper Mining Inc
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Section_Exhibit Name
RCE SL19
Email Name
RAR
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
success standard for range site A is 52%. The SL 19 Bond Release Block meets and exceeds the <br /> reclamation success standard for vegetation cover. <br /> The vegetation report shows that the reclaimed parcels are dominated by native perennial grasses. <br /> Native perennial graminoids account for 42.9% cover. Of the graminoid cover, 22.5% is <br /> composed of Wheatgrass species, 8.4% cover attributed Bluegrasses, 4.3% cover was from <br /> Mountain Brome. Further, 10.9% cover is attributed to perennial forbs, annuals and biennial <br /> forbs made up 7.2% cover, woody species accounted for 1.0% cover, and noxious weeds <br /> accounted for 12.1%. Table 1.2-2 in the SL-19 application provides a summary of the species <br /> and life forms sampled. Based on the perennial species of grasses, forbs and shrubs found at the <br /> site as indicated in the SL 19 application, it appears the species diversity and composition will <br /> support the post-mine land use. While noxious weeds were encountered at the site,they comprised <br /> 12.1%,a small percentage of the vegetative cover. Although meeting the species diversity success <br /> standard is not a requirement for phase II bond release,the establishment of a diverse and effective <br /> reclaimed community that supports the post mining land use allowed the Division to confirm that <br /> the reclaimed area is moving towards final reclamation success. <br /> Sedimentology <br /> The condition of the sediment ponds and any needed maintenance on the ponds receiving runoff <br /> from the bond release parcels were evaluated. Each of the ponds observed was functioning <br /> adequately and no required maintenance items were noted. With the exception of two stock <br /> ponds, one each in parcels FABO 1 and FAB99, each of the ponds receiving run-off from the bond <br /> release parcels is also receiving flow from affected lands not under consideration for bond release <br /> at this time. <br /> In accordance with Rule 3.03.1(3)(b)and with Section III.A.7.a. of the Division's 1995 Guideline <br /> Regarding Selected Coal Mine Bond Release Issues, Trapper submitted two evaluations to <br /> demonstrate that runoff from each bond release block will result in equivalent or lesser sediment <br /> contribution as compared to baseline conditions and similar undisturbed lands. <br /> Trapper's bond release application compares pre- and post-mining sediment yields by calculating <br /> expected sediment yields for both conditions. Trapper used the LISLE (Universal Soil Loss <br /> Equation), and SEDCAD 4 for Windows for this analysis. The LISLE calculates expected <br /> average annual soil loss per acre of land (rate of erosion), based on slope, rainfall pattern, soil <br /> type and vegetation type. SEDCAD 4 calculates the expected settleable solids concentration in <br /> runoff from a precipitation event. Trapper's two sets of pre-mining and post-mining sediment <br /> control demonstration models comprise Appendix 3 (SEDCAD 4)and Section 1.4(USLE),of the <br /> bond release application. <br /> LISLE Comparison: Only the "C" factor varies between the pre-mining and the post-mining <br /> calculations; all other variables are constant for pre-and post-mining. The C factor takes into <br /> account land use, vegetative canopy cover, effective cover and grass type. The pre-mining <br /> calculation utilized baseline vegetation cover values from the permit application (Table 2.3-13 <br /> and 4.4-2). The post-mining calculation uses vegetation cover data for the disturbed area collected <br /> in 2017. The variables used in the calculations are reasonable for making the comparison. The <br /> Permit Number C 1981010 <br /> SL19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.