My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019-09-18_REVISION - M1980244
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2019-09-18_REVISION - M1980244
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/18/2024 12:06:03 PM
Creation date
9/20/2019 7:45:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
9/18/2019
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
CC&V
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR116
Email Name
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
'1--00010— <br /> NEWMONT <br /> GOL DCORP. Newmont Goldcorp <br /> Cripple Creek&Victor Mine <br /> 100 N V Street <br /> PO Box 191 <br /> Victor,CO 80860 <br /> newmontgoldcorp.com <br /> SENT CERTIFIED RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED RECEIVED <br /> 7018 0680 0000 4627 5828 <br /> September 16, 2019 SEP 18 2019 <br /> DMSION OF RECLAMATION <br /> Mr. Timothy Cazier, P.E. <br /> MINING AND SAFETY <br /> Environmental Protection Specialist <br /> Colorado Department of Natural Resources <br /> Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br /> Office of Mined Land Reclamation <br /> 1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br /> Denver, Colorado 80203 <br /> Re: Permit No. M-1980-244; Cripple Creek &Victor Gold Mining Company; Cresson <br /> Project; Technical Revision 116 Preliminary Adequacy Review Response <br /> Dear Mr. Cazier: <br /> On September 13, 2019 Newmont Goldcorp Corporation - Cripple Creek and Victor Gold <br /> Mining Company (CC&V) received the Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br /> (DRMS) second adequacy review of Technical Revision (TR) No. 116, proposing an <br /> underground exploration project. Below are DRMS's comments in italics followed by <br /> CC&V's responses in bold. <br /> 1) Fiqures and Maps: The response was adequate. <br /> No response required. <br /> 2) Table 1: The response was adequate. <br /> No response required. <br /> 3) Five support buildings: The PAR requested dimensions of the buildings, which <br /> would typically include building height. Only length and width were provided. Our <br /> demolition costs are based on building volumes. Please provide building height <br /> information. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.