Laserfiche WebLink
All comments have been addressed and all information required under these rules <br /> have been met. <br /> All other information required under 4.10.1 has been net. <br /> 4.10.2—Site Inspection <br /> Inspections of waste banks shall he conducted as per this Rule. No additional information <br /> is required, <br /> 4.1 . —water Control Measure <br /> All other information required under 4.10.3 has been met. <br /> 4.10.4—Construction Requirement <br /> All information required under 4.10.4 has been met. <br /> 4.11 — Coal Mine Waste <br /> Rule 4.11 is not applicable to the information proposed under TR-27. <br /> Other <br /> All other comments stated in this section under my memo dated July 2019 have been <br /> addressed. The following are new comments: <br /> There appears to he an error in the cover page for the newly provided T'ruatner <br /> Report dated June 2015. The appendix has been labeled Appendix 10(4B) <br /> however the provided cover page is Appendix 104A . <br /> 0 On proposed Map King I—007, an area located south of the East Pond has been <br /> designated a Plant Growth Medium Storage Area. In the proposed pages Section <br /> 2.05.4, pages 4 and 5, there appears to be no discussion regarding this area or <br /> associated volumes for any plant growth medium that will be stored there. Please <br /> have GC provide more information regarding this area. <br /> . 2.2—Determination of Bond Amount <br /> I have performed a Reclamation Cost Estimate RCE for the proposed Refuse file <br /> Expansion (RPE). The total value of this estimate is$67,774.00(see attached cost <br /> estimate). The Following comments summarize the values used in the attached RC : <br /> * RPE area was measured at approximately 2.6 acres, <br /> 0 volumes were based on the RPE area and required depth of cover material , ' or <br /> growth medium o. ' . <br /> 2 <br />