Laserfiche WebLink
Cripple Creek&Victor Gold Mining Company <br /> Squaw Gulch VLF Phase 2A Part 1 ■ <br /> Record of Construction Report <br /> 475.0106.032 <br /> August 21,2019 <br /> the failed sample. Once the failing area was identified, that portion of the seam was <br /> capped. Fusion and Extrusion Destructive Testing Summaries are presented in Appendix <br /> K.5.1 and Appendix K.5.2, respectively, and the tensiometer certifications are presented <br /> in Appendix M. <br /> 3.5.7. Geomembrane Pressure Testing <br /> Pressure testing was performed to ensure all fusion welded seams had continuity <br /> throughout their entire length. The ends of the seam were sealed and the air channel in <br /> the seam was pressurized using a small air compressor to a minimum of 30 pounds per <br /> square inch (psi), for a minimum of five minutes.A pressure gauge and needle were used <br /> to monitor the air pressure in the seam. If the pressure dropped less than 3 psi, the <br /> opposite end of the seam from the pressure gauge was cut. If the needle dropped, <br /> continuity was confirmed throughout entire seam length and the test was considered <br /> "passing." If a pressure drop of more than 3 psi occurred or the continuity was not proven, <br /> smaller sections of the seam were tested to delineate the failing section of the seam. All <br /> failing seams or portions of seams were repaired, and vacuum tested.The Geomembrane <br /> Seam Pressure Testing Summary is presented in Appendix K.6. <br /> 3.5.8. Geomembrane Defects and Repairs <br /> The CQA Monitor constantly inspected the geomembrane for defects from the time it was <br /> deployed until it was covered with DCF. A defect is defined as any item in which a repair <br /> is necessary to create a continuously sealed geomembrane layer.All defects were marked <br /> with a defect number by the CQA Monitor. Repairs were performed using the extrusion <br /> welding method and patches extended at least 6 inches beyond the defect in all <br /> directions. All repairs were assigned a repair number and cross checked with defect <br /> numbers to ensure that all defects were repaired. <br /> All repairs and extrusion welded seams were non-destructively tested using a vacuum <br /> box. The area being tested was covered in soapy water and the vacuum box was sealed <br /> to the geomembrane. A vacuum was pulled over the area for at least 10 seconds and if <br /> no bubbles were present, the test passed. If bubbles were present, the area failed and <br /> was marked as a defect.The repair process would then be repeated for the failing vacuum <br /> test. Vacuum tests overlapped each other by a minimum of 3-inches. The Geomembrane <br /> Defect/Repair Summary, including vacuum testing logs, is presented in Appendix K.7. <br /> 3.5.9. Geomembrane Acceptance <br /> Prior to DCF placement,the geomembrane was accepted by Tetra Tech,Tezak, CC&V,and <br /> the CQA Monitor. All CQA logs and survey data were thoroughly reviewed ensuring that <br /> P:\Projects\0106.032 VLF2 Phase 2 CQA\J-REPORTS\Cert Report-Phase 2A Part 1\DRMS Comments\475.0106.032 CCV PHASE 2A Part 1 <br /> ROC REPORT_Revl.docx <br /> Page 17 <br />