Laserfiche WebLink
Civil Resources LLC <br /> August 21, 2019 <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> - Please verify consistency in the mining and reclamation plans with respect to the statement that <br /> the amended parcel will not be mined. <br /> - Exhibit E - Reclamation Plan will need to include spillway design information (sizing, capacity, <br /> etc.) and construction design information will need to be provided to verify adequacy of the <br /> proposed inlet/outlet structures. Please also verify the text in the reclamation plan that refers to <br /> fertilizer and trees for consistency with the provided adequacy responses. <br /> Please verify Exhibit F - Reclamation Plan Map to depict the proposed final shoreline <br /> configurations and setbacks for the reservoirs in Cells 2 and 3 with respect to the existing utilities <br /> (electric, gas, etc). <br /> Please verify the proposed locations of all spillway inlet/outlet structures on the Exhibit <br /> Reclamation Plan Map. Some justification should be provided as to why only one inlet/outlet <br /> structure is believed to be sufficient for Cell 5. Given the configuration of the cell and proximity <br /> to the river, DRMS feels a reinforced outlet structure located near the southeast corner of the cell <br /> may also be required to prevent stream capture during a flood event. <br /> - Please provide additional rationale for the statement made in the adequacy response for Exhibit <br /> G that"... the mining and reclamation are not expected to directly affect the surface or <br /> groundwater systems." <br /> - Exhibit L—Reclamation Cost Estimate will need to include detailed information for the line <br /> item(s) for spillway construction. Reclamation costs provided will be reviewed by DRMS when <br /> all adequacy issites have been addressed. This Exhibit should be updated as needed to reflect all <br /> changes made during the adequacy review process. <br /> - Permittee still needs to obtain legal right of entry from Town of Milliken for the parcel in the <br /> permit located on the west side of the permit for Exhibit N, and information for Town of <br /> Milliken must be included in Exhibit O. <br /> For Exhibit S, please provide a separate map and a table indicating where the structures are <br /> located within the permit and within 200' of the permit, and information showing who owns <br /> what structures, so that the provided structure agreement mailing information can be verified to <br /> be accurate and complete. <br /> - DRMS has reviewed the updated stability report provided demonstrating that the existing setback <br /> from the powerline within Cell 2 (23 feet from shore to pole) is stable. DRMS noted that one of <br /> the assumptions made in the analysis is that the existing shoreline is at the final configuration <br /> and has been sloped at no steeper than 3:1, H:V. Has this assumption been verified, and if so, <br />