My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019-05-03_REVISION - M2004013
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2004013
>
2019-05-03_REVISION - M2004013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2024 9:20:26 AM
Creation date
5/6/2019 3:33:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2004013
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
5/3/2019
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Pete Lien & Sons
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR2
Email Name
JPL
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr.Lennberg <br /> April 15,2019 <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br /> PLS Response: The ponds are planned to remain in place, however if relocated they would be <br /> the same size per the allowed SWSP. <br /> 7.What are the dimensions of the existing ponds at the site; length,width and depth? <br /> PLS Response: Please note the following dimensions are of the excavated area and not to be <br /> used in determining exposed pond surface area, due to slopes and depth to water surface. As <br /> such the western pond is 132' x 267',the northeastern pond is 325'x 238',the southern pond <br /> is 86'x 400'and the southeastern pond is 176'x 89'. The average depth of the excavated areas <br /> is 22 feet. <br /> 8. In the event that there is a flood that inundates the cell during active mining, being located <br /> within the 100-year floodplain, how will you ensure that captured water is returned to the natural <br /> drainage system within 72 hours? <br /> PLS Response: PLS will ensure captured water is returned via pumping to the channel leading <br /> to the Arkansas River, breaching the slurry wall to allow captured water a hydraulic passage to <br /> the surrounding groundwater,or a combination of both. <br /> 9. After mining and backfilling is completed is there a risk of the cell being saturated through <br /> flooding and creating a localized area of saturation that cannot be drained and thus affecting the <br /> hydrologic balance at the site? Has the Operator considered breaching the slurry wall after the <br /> cell is mined out in order to maintain the prevailing hydrologic balance at the site? <br /> PLS Response: The slurry wall will be breached in areas that will not be used in possible future <br /> slurry wall cells (i.e. south wall). This will allow for a hydrologic balance with the surrounding <br /> groundwater and to ensure no water storage occurs within the cell. <br /> 10.At this time the Division is not requiring submittal of the slurry wall construction specifications <br /> but in the event that the proposed cell southern wall gets incorporated into the adjacent final <br /> water resources pond the Division will require those specifications as well as QA/QC <br /> documentation associated with its construction. <br /> PLS Response: PLS understands and will collect the necessary information in case the described <br /> future permit action occurs. <br /> 11.As a part of the review of TR-02,the Division will evaluate the financial warranty to determine <br /> the cost of reclamation for this phase of the mining operation. Reclamation of the phase will be <br /> accomplished by backfilling the cell to approximate original grade. All information necessary to <br /> calculate the costs of reclamation must be submitted and broken down into the various phases <br /> of reclamation as required by Rule 6.4.12. Please include with the provided information the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.