Laserfiche WebLink
12. Section 3.1.5(4), please better define or clarify "....after mining has moved away far <br /> enough...." Replaced <br /> 13. Section 3.1.5(9), please revise the statement to read "The Operator/Applicant does not <br /> propose to import material to the site for the purposes of backfill." Revised <br /> 14. Section 3.1.5(10), please revise the first sentence of the section to read"All mined <br /> material will be handled in such a manner so as to prevent any unauthorized release of <br /> pollutants to the surface drainage system." Revised <br /> 15. Section 3.1.6(d), please indicate on the Mining Plan map the location and details <br /> associated with the earthen berms and what material will be used to construct them. <br /> Location added and detail added to Reclamation Plan Map <br /> 16. Section 3.1.9(7), please revise to the second to last sentence of this section to read <br /> "The manure, if used, must contain......" Additionally, please provide a statement about <br /> how the mulch will be crimped. Revised and added crimping description <br /> 17. Section 3.1.12, the Operator/Applicant proposes to mark out the affected land <br /> boundary which is proposed to be 339 or 329.9 acres. Please commit to marking out both <br /> the affected boundary as well as placing monuments to delineate the disturbed area <br /> boundary of 95.6. Does the Operator/Applicant plan on increasing the maximum <br /> disturbance over time? No plan to increase maximum disturbance over time. <br /> Clarification to monument phase boundaries add. <br /> 18. Section 6.4.5(e)(ii), please clarify if the maximum disturbed land area, comprised of <br /> land being mined and in reclamation, is 95.6 acres or if the 95.6 acres references only <br /> land that will be in reclamation. Clarified max 95.6 acres to be in mining or <br /> reclamation at any time. <br /> 19. Section 6.4.5(f)(iii), please make the seeding table in this section match the table on <br /> the Reclamation Plan Map. Revised <br /> 20. Section 6.4.5(f)(vi), the depth of topsoil presented is 1-6 inches which is different <br /> from the 3-6 inches proposed in section 6.4.5 (1), please clarify. The Division encourages <br /> the Operator/Applicant to replace topsoil at a depth of 3-6 inches on all reclaimed lands. <br /> Revised to 3-6 inches <br /> EXHIBIT F—Reclamation Plan Map (Rule 6.4.6): <br /> 21. As mentioned previously the earthen berms that are proposed to be left at the site <br /> after mining are not shown on the Reclamation Plan Map. Please indicate on the map <br /> where the berms are proposed to be located. Please comment on the reestablishment of <br /> the Dog Springs Arroyo, currently it does not appear that the area will completely drain <br /> resulting in a large pooling area. A no-mining buffer has been added to the plan. This <br /> buffer will be 100 feet on either side of the flowline. See response to Item 22 below. <br /> page 3 of 5 file(J:\2018\2018-088\AdequacyReviews\Reviewl\Franciscotti2-adequacy-response-l.doc) <br />