My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019-02-13_REVISION - M2000077 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2000077
>
2019-02-13_REVISION - M2000077 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2025 3:36:18 AM
Creation date
2/14/2019 2:04:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2000077
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
2/13/2019
Doc Name
Request For Succession Of Operator
From
PK Enterprises, Inc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
SO1
Email Name
ERR
BJC
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MUIC Creek Gravel Pit - Decision Noticc and FON'SI 0i/i /UU <br /> Pa,Te i <br /> the use of seeded species fronn locally native plants, l'crtilizers Lind mulch will also <br /> apply to the reclamation activities. <br /> Prior to be�crinnin`, work on the lIMUIC Creck Gravel Pit operation, PK Enterprises, Inc., <br /> Will II11plCl11ent a public notification process. This process shall include media <br /> releases, personal contacts and general information about the benefits of the project. <br /> PK Enterprises will also work with Mueller State Park and Forest Service personnel <br /> to develop a high quality brochure about the project for distribution to the public. <br /> The public notification process and brochure will be developed prior to the beginning <br /> of work in the gravel pit. <br /> Comparison of Alternatives <br /> i <br /> The criteria selected by the Forest Service for evaluation of alternatives were based <br /> primarily upon environmental and feasibility factors. In particular, alternatives with <br /> reduced environmental impacts and with reclamation potential were favored. Other <br /> considerations included the supply of gravel. <br /> • Alternative A —Under this alternative, the nuisance factors associated with the <br /> proposed quarry operations would be avoided, but the existing abandoned quarry i <br /> located on both private land and National Forest System land would remain in its i <br /> current condition and no action would be takers to reclaim the site. This alternative <br /> would result in additional soil losses due to wind and water erosion processes, <br /> continued sedimentation to streams and wetlands, colonization of disturbed areas with <br /> aggressive noxious plants, the gradual loss of trees and understory vegetation on <br /> National Forest System land due to erosion of steep cut slopes, and the associated <br /> J degradation of wildlife habitat and scenic values. <br /> • AIternative B—The proposed action was not selected. Under Alternative B, the <br /> gravel mine would be developed and reclaimed in three phases: 1) pre-production site i <br /> preparation; 2) production; and 3) reclarnation to be initiated concurrently with the <br /> production phase. The purpose and need for the proposed project would be to <br /> provide aggregate for use in Teller County, to mitigate impacts form the abandoned <br /> quarry that currently exist and to reduce the potential for additional impacts to occur <br /> in the future. The main positive environmental impacts resulting from the proposed <br /> action (Alternative B) include: reduction of the cut slopes, reshaping of contours to <br /> simulate natural topographic conditions, erosion control, reduction of sedimentation <br /> from the site, long-term improvement in air quality, improvement of aquatic and <br /> wildlife habitat, recreation opportunities, revenues to the Forest Service from the sale <br /> of trees and gravel, provide aggregate for use in Teller County, and significant <br /> improvement of the aesthetic character of the site. This alternative, however, would <br /> result in impacts to air quality, noise levels, and wildlife during the production period, <br /> and the use of non-native species in the seed mix during reclamation would contribute <br /> to the displacement of n.ative species. This alternative would require the use of <br /> explosives on occasion to fracture exposed rock: outc,-oppings. <br /> i <br /> Hydrosphere Resource Consultants,1002 Walnut Suite 200.Boulder.CO 90302 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.