Laserfiche WebLink
h <br />MCC West Elk Mine Sunset Trail Lease Modifications 2011 Hydrology Survey 2 <br />in the MGFCO tract, but they were not visited during this survey per instructions from Kathy <br />Welt at Mountain Coal Company. HydroGeo conversed with John Monarch prior to initiating <br />the field surveys, in order to determine the most efficient access routes to the survey area. <br />Permission from affected private land owners was acquired by MCC prior to surveying. A <br />general location map is presented in Figure 1 and the Sunset Trail Lease Modifications (STLM) <br />Study Area Map is presented in Figure 2. <br />The survey methodology consisted of two teams of two people walking the survey area <br />and identifying springs and seeps. Each spring/seep site was given a unique site ID and sites <br />were marked with a piece of lath labeled with the site ID. The actual source (emergence point) <br />of the spring/seep was identified when possible and its location was recorded with a hand-held <br />Garmin Etrex global positioning system (GPS) instrument. The source of the spring or seep was <br />also noted as issuing from bedrock or unconsolidated sediments where obvious. Spring flow was <br />measured as close to the source of the spring as possible using a graduated cup or bucket. The <br />flow was measured by recording the time it takes to fill a container of known volume. Three <br />flow readings were taken, recorded, and then averaged. Average flows were tabulated in the <br />summary tables presented in this report. For very low flow sites, flows were manually diverted <br />momentarily to allow more accurate measurement. If the flows in seep areas formed a channel <br />below the seep field, measurements were taken at the highest possible location in the channel. <br />Otherwise, spring and seep flows were estimated based on field observations. If no definitive <br />spring flow could be determined in ponds, the outflow from ponds was measured where <br />applicable. <br />The areal extent and flows of spring and seep complexes with multiple sources were <br />estimated and recorded in the field book. In addition, the field water quality parameters of pH <br />(s.u.), electrical conductivity (µ&cm), and temperature (° C) were measured with a calibrated <br />multi -meter, probe and recorded. The field water quality testing equipment was calibrated daily <br />with reference buffer solutions, in accordance with manufacturer instructions. Digital <br />photographs of each site were taken to depict both detail and broad perspective views. The date, <br />time, direction and other pertinent information were recorded in a photo log. <br />The ,locations of the 70 sites identified in the Sunset Trail Spring Survey are depicted on <br />Figure 2. The sites are generally categorized into the following three groups: <br />• Spring Related Features including springs, springs feeding ponds, spring/pond/wetland <br />complexes, springs with wetlands, seeps, and seeps with wetlands <br />• Pond Related Features including natural and man-made ponds or ponds with wetlands <br />• Other/Miscellaneous Features including stream flow sites, wetland areas without springs <br />or ponds, etc. <br />February 2012 HydroGeo, Inc. <br />