My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-11-19_PERMIT FILE - C2010089A (6)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C2010089
>
2018-11-19_PERMIT FILE - C2010089A (6)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/14/2019 7:47:19 AM
Creation date
12/12/2018 8:44:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010089A
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
11/19/2018
Doc Name
Protection of Hydrologic Balance
Section_Exhibit Name
Section 2.05.6(3)
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
been monitored since 1987. Spoil Spring #1 water mixes with irrigation runoff and return water <br />from Nygren Draw and then discharges into Tuttle Draw located about 1600 ft. downstream <br />from the spoil spring. Tuttle Draw enters the San Miguel River approximately 2 miles to the <br />southwest. <br />Historic sample data (since 1987) from surface water sites, NPDES 001, SW -N3, and the San <br />Miguel River has shown that the concentration of TDS in these sources varies inversely with the <br />flow volume. Total dissolved solids (TDS) increase during the low flow periods and decrease <br />during the high flow periods. For NPDES 001 and SW -N3 high flows correspond with the <br />irrigation season; however, the San Miguel River is typically in low flow condition during the <br />irrigation season. During the non -irrigation season flows from NPDES 001 and SW -N3 are low <br />and TDS is higher while the San Miguel TDS is lower due to the higher flow, (see Table <br />2.05.6(3)-4 of New Horizon #2 Area permit). This presents both a high and low flow case which <br />are complicated by the fact that spoil spring flow predicted to occur after the New Horizon Mine <br />has been reclaimed (2013-2014) has not yet occurred. Therefore, the impacts to the receiving <br />waters will be evaluated for both high and low cases, with and without irrigation, and including <br />the predicted spoil spring flows from New Horizon Mine and the existing spoil spring flow from <br />the old Peabody Nucla Mine (New Horizon 1 permit area). The irrigation case corresponds to the <br />September/October time period when flows are fairly low in the San Miguel River. The non - <br />irrigation period corresponds to March/April when flows in the San Miguel are usually at peak. <br />As described previously, irrigation of the reclaimed NHN Mine will produce a flow in the spoil <br />of about 81 ac-ft./yr,( at full irrigation). Over the length of the irrigation season (165 days) this is <br />an average of about 0.248 cfs. During the non -irrigation season the flow from the NHN backfill <br />spring will mimic flow levels from the old Peabody Mine or about 0.041 cfs. The TDS values for <br />the NHN backfill spring discharge were averaged from sample analyses from NPDES 001 <br />discharges from 1987 to 2000 and reported on Table 2.05.6(3)-4 of the New Horizon #2 Area <br />permit. The Tuttle Draw TDS and flow values were also averaged from analyses and <br />measurements from 1987 through 2000 and likewise reported, (see Table 2.05.6(3)-4 of the New <br />Horizon #2 Area permit), as taken at surface water site SW -N3. Table 2.05.6(3)-2b included in <br />Appendix 2.05.6(3)-2 shows this information for these as well as other sample points. <br />Table 2.05.6(3)-2 shows the predicted impact of the NHN backfill spring discharge on the <br />receiving waters of Tuttle Draw. During the irrigation season, the predicted TDS for Tuttle Draw <br />is an increase of about 9 mg/1 or about 0.5%. During the non -irrigation season the predicted TDS <br />for Tuttle Draw is an increase of 26 mg/l or about 1.2%. <br />The spoil water inflows from NHN Mine will influence the quality of Tuttle Draw to a minor <br />degree. However, within about 2 miles, this flow enters the San Miguel River where the flow is <br />so much larger than the Tuttle Draw flow that the impact is negligible. Further, the water in <br />Tuttle Draw is too high in dissolved solids for domestic drinking water or for use in irrigation <br />Section 2.05.6(3) Page 25 March 2018 (TR -16) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.