My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-11-19_PERMIT FILE - C2010089A (6)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C2010089
>
2018-11-19_PERMIT FILE - C2010089A (6)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/14/2019 7:47:19 AM
Creation date
12/12/2018 8:44:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010089A
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
11/19/2018
Doc Name
Protection of Hydrologic Balance
Section_Exhibit Name
Section 2.05.6(3)
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
principal cause of elevated TDS, and that the percent of pyrite in the spoil was the determining <br />factor in the length of time that the TDS would be elevated in the spoil water. A spoil pyrite <br />content of I% by weight, for example, was predicted to fully oxidize in 1600 years (their Table <br />18). TDS levels in the spoil water were approximately 4500 ppm, which was a significant <br />increase over the overburden aquifer water in the area. The coal mine overburden at that site is <br />somewhat younger (upper Cretaceous) in age but is similar in lithologic character to that of the <br />adjacent New Horizon Mine. The USGS study methodology was used as a basis to predict the <br />time frames of slightly elevated TDS in the spoil water at the New Horizon Mine, (see New <br />Horizon #2 Area permit Section 2.05.6(3)). The sulfur content in the overburden at NHN is <br />similar to that at the New Horizon Mine (see Table 2.04.6-2, Section 2.04.6 of this application). <br />The result of that prediction indicated that about 800 years would be required to oxidize the <br />sulfur in the overburden at the New Horizon Mine and therefore about 800 years to oxidize the <br />sulfur at NHN Mine. As the oxidation of the pyrite is the main source of increased TDS in <br />backfill water quality, elevated TDS from spoil water springs could remain for several centuries. <br />The NHN Mine will have two significant differences to the results observed at Seneca II. First, <br />the calcite present in the spoil at NHN permit area seems to react with acid produced by the <br />oxidation of pyrite and take a substantial amount of sulfate from solution directly into solid <br />calcium sulfate. This keeps the dissolved solids content somewhat constant no matter how high <br />or low the inflow water quality is with regard to TDS. Second, the Seneca 11 site is a dry -land <br />reclaimed area where the only recharge into the spoil is a minor amount from precipitation and <br />seepage from the underburden aquifers. Total measured discharge from the spoil was only 3" per <br />year. The NHN Mine will be partially irrigated with water of better quality over a large portion <br />(45%) of the year. As described earlier, this results in a total movement through the spoil of <br />approximately 13" per year (81 ac -ft). Since the amount of water moving through the NHN <br />backfill is greater, it should oxidize the pyrite more rapidly and also flush other salts which are <br />contributing to the increase in TDS at a higher rate. For this reason, a ratio of the discharge at <br />both sites could be used to predict the time frame of slightly elevated spoil water quality. This <br />ratio - 3"/13", as applied to 1500 years results in a time frame of 346 years until all the pyrite is <br />oxidized. When considering all the variables involved, this means that it could dissipate within a <br />range of 200 to 500 years. The TDS should begin to drop before this time. Once the pyrite is <br />fully oxidized and other salts are flushed out, the backfill water quality should approach the <br />existing stream water quality, possibly dropping to 800 to 1200 mg/1 TDS. It is not likely that the <br />backfill water will ever reach the low TDS of the ditch- run water as seepage from the <br />overburden zones into the backfill will continue as long as the 2nd Park irrigation continues. <br />Impacts To Receiving Waters - Tuttle Draw As described earlier, drainage through the NHN <br />backfill material will move to the south following the path of least resistance along the pit floor <br />and issue at the general location of Spoil Spring # 1, (see Map 2.04.7-1). Spoil Spring #1, is the <br />spoil water discharge from the old Peabody Nucla Mine (New Horizon #1 Area permit) and has <br />Section 2.05.6(3) Page 24 March 2018 (TR -16) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.