My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-11-19_PERMIT FILE - C2010089A (6)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C2010089
>
2018-11-19_PERMIT FILE - C2010089A (6)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/14/2019 7:47:19 AM
Creation date
12/12/2018 8:44:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010089A
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
11/19/2018
Doc Name
Protection of Hydrologic Balance
Section_Exhibit Name
Section 2.05.6(3)
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
through the oxidation of pyrite. Based on laboratory tests on overburden cores, calcite is present <br />throughout the overburden. Calcite serves two functions. First, it buffers the pH of the water, <br />which overall tends to slow the oxidation of pyrite, slowing the production of acid. Second, it <br />will neutralize the acid that is produced. The core samples that exhibited low paste pH are <br />surrounded by non-acid producing, calcite -bearing rocks. The water that contacts the low -paste <br />pH materials will have first reacted with calcite, and therefore developed a pH -buffer capacity of <br />its own. The groundwater monitoring data indicate that mixed overburden and interburden <br />waters have near neutral pH. Sample pH's less than 6 are associated only with the lower Dakota <br />coal. Where the coal's permeability is high enough to produce about 5 gpm during sampling, the <br />acid -producing reactions do not appear to be fast enough to maintain the pH of the water less <br />than 5. Oxidation rates may increase because of the mining process. However, the rate of <br />oxidation is only one of the constraints on the production of acid. Other constraints are imposed <br />by the quantity of calcite present and the reactivity of the pyrite. The paste -pH test, conducted <br />under oxidizing conditions, indicates that a very small proportion of the overburden is likely to <br />produce acid. This overburden is generally located in a thin zone immediately above the coals. <br />The acid that is produced should be quickly neutralized. <br />The ability of the calcite in the overburden spoil to neutralize any acid produced is dependent <br />upon a number of factors such as: <br />a) The uniform distribution of calcite in the replaced overburden, <br />b) The higher transmissivity of the backfill allows irrigation water with higher levels of <br />oxygen to move quickly through the spoil, resulting in faster breakdown of the pyrite in <br />the backfill, <br />c) High void channels developing in the backfill at the bottom of the pit which may serve as <br />the primary conduit for flow in the backfill, <br />d) The quantity of calcite available in the areas needed most, <br />e) Other chemistry which may influence the neutralization reactions. <br />For these reasons, there is a possibility that water leaching through backfill may result in a higher <br />level of TDS for some period of time, until pyrite in the overburden spoil is fully oxidized and <br />removed. This was found to occur at the Seneca II Coal Mine in northwest Colorado and was the <br />subject of a study by the USGS in 1994. Sampling data gathered through the last 13 years at the <br />New Horizon Mine suggests that some pyrite is oxidizing but is being neutralized, as described <br />below. <br />The analysis of geochemical controls on groundwater quality at the New Horizon #1 Mine <br />backfill suggests that the water chemistry and concentrations of most elements of concern are <br />controlled by mineralogical reactions that will resist changes in water chemistry. It appears that <br />any pyrite (FeS2) oxidation gets neutralized by calcite (CaCO3) present in the same spoil <br />material. This results in the iron precipitating as iron oxides. The slightly higher than normal pH <br />Section 2.05.6(3) Page 20 March 2018 (TR -16) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.