My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-11-19_PERMIT FILE - C2010089A (6)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C2010089
>
2018-11-19_PERMIT FILE - C2010089A (6)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/14/2019 7:47:19 AM
Creation date
12/12/2018 8:44:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010089A
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
11/19/2018
Doc Name
Protection of Hydrologic Balance
Section_Exhibit Name
Section 2.05.6(3)
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Backfilling of pit walls and continued irrigation adjacent to the permit boundary will allow <br />ground water levels to recover as demonstrated by the 80% recovery of the water levels at GW - <br />N8 in less than 20 years. The ground water from the Dakota bedrock zones has not been used to <br />date because of poor quality and low production potential. Further, the "bedrock" seepage water <br />will continue to flow tributary to Tuttle Draw maintaining the hydrologic balance of the San <br />Miguel River. Infiltrating irrigation water on the reclaimed backfill will also travel the path of <br />least resistance and issue at the SS# 1 location as increased flows tributary to Tuttle Draw and <br />The San Miguel River. The impact of the backfill material on the ground water flow and <br />recharge is therefore minimal. Two quarters (6 months) prior to initiation of mining activity at <br />NHN, flow and water quality monitoring (field parameters) at the SS# 1 location will be resumed <br />in order to detect and evaluate changes to the spring flow. The ground water aquifer below the <br />Dakota coal, (the Brushy Basin Member of the Morrison Formation) has much better water <br />quality and will not be affected by mining and reclamation at NHN Mine. Shale layers below the <br />mined coals prevent interaction between the spoil and this aquifer, which gets its recharge up dip <br />and away from the mine operations. <br />4) Containment of Pit Inflow and Impacts on Water Ouality All runoff and pit pumpage from <br />disturbed areas will be routed through approved NPDES sedimentation pond(s). These pond(s) <br />will be designed and constructed to impound runoff and pit pumpage from areas disturbed by <br />mining and provide sufficient residence time to insure that the pond discharge water chemistry <br />meets the effluent requirements specified in the NPDES Permit. A review of the chemical and <br />flow data indicates that the potential for any discharge from any NPDES pond to exceed <br />receiving stream or federal standards is minimal. A copy of the approved NPDES permit is on <br />file at the New Horizon North Mine office and is available for review at the Division's request. <br />5) Potential Impacts of Replaced Spoil on Groundwater Quality Since the mining operation <br />will disrupt the overburden above the LDx Seam and remove the LDx Seam, these are the only <br />two stratigraphic zones that will be affected by the operation. As described in the section on <br />overburden water quality, the pre -mine quality of the overburden water is poor, with TDS <br />generally in the 3000 ppm range and some ions exceeding limits for most water uses. The <br />primary potential for impacts to ground water quality will occur from increased water infiltration <br />causing an accelerated oxidation of pyrite in the backfill material. Other salts may also dissolve <br />more readily in the highly permeable backfill. The potential for minor amounts of sulfuric acid <br />production could cause lower pH, which would then result in higher rates of dissolution of other <br />chemical compounds in the spoil, resulting in higher TDS. The water draining through the <br />backfill will most likely not saturate the back fill south of Meehan Draw, (see Figure 2.05.6(3)-1) <br />but rather drain to the south and issue as a spring at the SS# 1 location. <br />Spoil Water Chemistry Concerning impacts from the conversion of overburden to backfill <br />material, the available data indicate that a small proportion of the overburden may produce acid <br />Section 2.05.6(3) Page 19 March 2018 (TR -16) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.