My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-11-05_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981044
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981044
>
2018-11-05_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981044
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2018 10:35:20 AM
Creation date
11/9/2018 10:34:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
11/5/2018
Doc Name Note
For RN7
Doc Name
Proposed Decision and Findings of Compliance
From
DRMS
To
Moffat County Mining, LLC
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Email Name
RAR
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
183
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Williams Fork Mines Prepared by: R. Reilley M.S. GISP <br />C1981044 5 November 2018 <br /> <br /> <br /> 28 <br />abandoned Eagle No. 9 Mine's Portal Excavation, depicted on Permit Map 25. The details of this <br />disposal plan are presented on Map 28 of the amended permit application, including a detailed <br />site plan and appropriate cross sections. Mining ceased at the No. 9 Mine in 1985. <br /> <br />The combined capacities of these two disposal areas represent the refuse generated by the <br />production of 60 million tons of coal, or about 15 to 20 years of mining. <br /> <br />The pile was designed with maximum facial outslopes of 4:1 (horizontal to vertical) and a <br />maximum height of 55 feet. A stability analysis performed by CTL/Thompson, Inc. ascertained <br />a minimum static slope safety factor of 3.6, assuming an angle of internal friction of 42º and <br />cohesion of 0 pounds per square foot. Confirming laboratory testing performed by the applicant <br />determined an angle of internal friction of 42º and a cohesion of 1,500 pounds per square foot. <br />Therefore, the safety factor determination presented within the preliminary stability analysis has <br />proven to be conservative in nature and exceeds the required 1.5 minimum acceptable static <br />slope safety factor required by the regulations. <br /> <br />The foundation area of the coal processing waste pile was prepared by removal of topsoil and <br />unacceptable subsoils and the installation of a gravel and tile subdrain and peripheral toe drain. <br />These drains prevent ground water from flowing into the waste material. Waste material was <br />placed in 24-inch horizontal lifts, compacted to 90 percent of the waste material's maximum dry <br />density, as determined utilizing AASHTO testing specification T-99. Compliance with the <br />certified inspection requirements of Rule 4.10.2 will assure compliance with the approved plans <br />and construction standards. <br /> <br />A. The Division proposed to re-approve plans for use, construction, and maintenance of a <br />coal mine waste disposal area (4.10.1(1)) through MR54, Solid Waste Dump Site Cleanup. <br /> <br />B. The disposal area was inspected on a regular basis by a qualified professional specialist <br />under the direction of the professional engineer, experienced in construction of similar earth and <br />waste structures. The Division approved inspection by this person as appropriate (4.10.2(1)). <br /> <br /> <br />VII. Backfilling and Grading <br /> <br />Rule 2.05.5 requires a plan/schedule for backfilling and grading in sufficient detail to allow the <br />Division to evaluate the feasibility of the proposed post-mining topography and the required <br />bond estimate. Volumes of material to be moved were presented on Table 63 of the permit <br />application, and the final backfilled topography is depicted on Map 29. <br /> <br /> <br />The applicant received approval of technical revisions in May of 1986 to extend development <br />work from the No. 5 Mine to the F seam of the No. 6 Mine. The waste rock produced was <br />approved for placement against the existing highwall of the 5A Portal. Designs for this <br />development rock placement are included in Exhibit 40. The total volume approved for <br />placement is 12,000 cubic yards.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.