Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Williams Fork Mines Prepared by: R. Reilley M.S. GISP <br />C1981044 5 November 2018 <br /> <br /> <br /> 27 <br />of indigenous plant propagules to aid in establishment of initial vegetative culture on reclaimed <br />areas. <br /> <br />B. The Division has determined selected overburden materials shall be used for, or as a <br />supplement to, topsoil. This variance from the use of topsoil applies to areas at the 5A Portal, <br />old shop, and temporary office area due to their disturbance prior to the Act and the lack of <br />salvaged topsoil at these locations. This determination is based on physical and chemical <br />analyses and field trials approved by the Division. Previously, Stipulation No. 2 had been <br />attached to the permit. This stipulation was complied with upon the submission of Technical <br />Revision No. 8. Details of the overburden analysis may be found in Exhibit 41 (4.06.2(4)(a)). <br /> <br /> <br />IV. Sealing of Drilled Holes and Underground Openings <br /> <br />A detailed description of the sealing of underground openings may be found in Section 2.05.4 of <br />the permit with a typical portal seal illustrated in Figure 57. Drill hole sealing may be found in <br />Section 2.05 of the permit. All existing and future drill holes will be sealed in accordance with <br />Rule 4.07. The Mine No. 9 portals were sealed prior to waste material being placed at the No. 9 <br />Mine Portal Excavation. Inspection reports indicate that sealing and initial material storage in <br />the No. 9 Mine Portal Excavation commenced prior to 1991. The Mine No. 5 portals were <br />sealed in 1997 in accordance with Rule 4.07.3. The No. 5 portal face-up area was backfilled, <br />sloped and final graded. Mine No. 5A portals were sealed in 2003 in accordance with Rule <br />4.07.3. Backfill of the Mine No. 5A portals has not occurred at the time of this writing. <br /> <br /> <br />V. Use of Explosives <br /> <br />MCM is not proposing to conduct surface blasting in their mining operation. Should MCM need <br />to conduct surface blasting in the mining operation, the requirements of this section must be <br />addressed and submitted to the Division for approval. <br /> <br /> <br />VI. Coal Mine Waste Banks <br /> <br />The applicant presented a detailed engineering design for an approximately one-million-cubic- <br />yard coal processing waste pile, also known as the Surface Waste Pile, located within the <br />boundaries of the Williams Fork Mines permit area, as depicted on Permit Map 25. Exhibit 21 <br />of the permit contains a design report for the coal processing waste pile prepared by <br />CTL/Thompson, Inc., and three supplemental documents pertaining to amendments in design <br />details and construction specifications, as well as results of inspection certifications performed <br />by the design engineer. Collectively, these documents represent the amended design for the coal <br />processing waste pile at the Williams Fork Mines complex. <br /> <br />The applicant is approved to dispose of an additional 200,000 cubic yards of waste in the