My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-10-30_INSPECTION - C1982057
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Coal
>
C1982057
>
2018-10-30_INSPECTION - C1982057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2018 7:05:46 AM
Creation date
11/5/2018 6:55:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
10/30/2018
Doc Name
Inspection Report
From
DRMS
To
Seneca Property, LLC
Inspection Date
10/25/2018
Email Name
RAR
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
25 October 2018 C-1982057/Seneca II W Mine RAR <br /> <br /> <br />3 <br />Number of Partial Inspections this Fiscal Year: 5 <br />Number of Complete Inspections this Fiscal Year: 1 <br /> <br />ROADS Rule 4.03 <br />Construction 4.03.1(3), 4.03.2(3); Drainage 4.03.1(4), 4.03.2(4); Surfacing and Maintenance 4.03.1(5) <br />and (6) 4.03.2(5) and (6). <br />o Roads in and around the site appeared in good condition and functioning adequately. <br />o No fugitive dust was noted. <br />o No rutted areas or standing water were noted. <br /> <br />HYDROLOGIC BALANCE- Rule 4.05 <br />General Requirements 4.05.1; Effluent Standards 4.05.2; Divergence and Conveyance of Overland Flow <br />4.05.3; Diversions 4.05.4; Sediment Control Measures 4.05.5, 4.05.6; Discharge Structures 4.05.7; <br />Impoundments 4.05.9; Ground Water Monitoring 4.05.13; Underground Mine Entry 4.05.10; Surface <br />and Ground Water Monitoring 4.05.13;Stream Buffer Zones 4.05.18: <br /> <br />o No pond discharge was noted at time of inspection. <br />o Ponds appeared to have adequate water quality from above. <br />o Check dams and contour ditches appeard intact. <br />o Reconstructed drainages were visible and appeared to be well armored and functioning <br />properly. <br />o Contour ditches appeared to be functioning adequately. <br />o There appeared to be a gully on slope of Stoc Pond 26. This should be verified and monitored <br />as needed. <br /> <br />REVEGETATION - Rule 4.15 <br />General Requirements 4.15.1; <br />o Reclamation and revegetation appeared to be progressing adequately. <br />o Vegetation was beginning to brown. <br />o No extensive areas devoid of vegetation were apparent in the imagery. <br /> <br /> <br /> PHOTOS <br /> <br /> Photo 1: Overview of reclamation in foreground and shop area behind Pond 6. <br />Pond 6 <br />Reclamation
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.