My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-10-18_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981019
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2018-10-18_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/22/2018 7:35:27 AM
Creation date
10/22/2018 7:07:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
10/18/2018
Doc Name Note
for SL14
Doc Name
Proposed Decision and Findings of Compliance
From
DRMS
To
Colowyo Coal Company L.P.
Email Name
ZTT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Proposed Decision and Findings of Compliance October 2018 <br />Partial Phase II and III Bond Release SL-14 Page 7 <br />During the partial Phase II and III Bond Release inspection, participants walked through each of <br />the bond release request parcels to allow for visual assessment of compliance with pertinent <br />requirements as described above in Section III of this document. A summary of the observations <br />are discussed below and the details are further discussed in the associated inspection report. <br /> <br />Phase II <br /> <br />Topsoil Replacement <br /> <br />A total of 70 topsoil verification holes were dug and measured during the June 2018 inspection <br />in order to verify topsoil depths within the areas being requested for Phase II of the SL-14 <br />application. Colowyo is approved for variable topsoil depth placement and as per Colowyo’s <br />PAP, “After the final regrading is completed, the topsoil will be reapplied as shown on the <br />disturbed land areas shown on the Topsoil Handling Map (Map 28 and 28A). Future topsoil <br />redistribution will be done at an average depth of eight (8) inches based on the volumetric <br />analysis of available materials and areas as presented in Rule 2.05.” Holes were dug individually <br />with a shovel at randomized predetermined locations. Each of the 70 topsoil verification holes <br />were dug to a minimum of 8 inches in depth. The topsoil hole was then immediately backfilled <br />after the depth of topsoil was verified. Figure 3 show the location of each hole. Of the 70 <br />topsoil verification holes dug, five were found to be between 4 – 8 inches in depth while the <br />remaining were found to be 8+ inches. <br /> <br />Vegetation Cover <br /> <br />The Colowyo Mine uses two reference areas for the comparison of success of their reclamation <br />parcels. The reference areas are the sagebrush reference area (established 1981) and the mountain <br />shrub reference area (established in 1980, which is further separated into a mesic aspect and a xeric <br />aspect). Success standards are based on weighted average of the pre-mining vegetation <br />communities in each reclamation block (as shown on Map 3 and 4 in Colowyo’s PAP). <br /> <br />Permit Page 4.15-18 states that the “…herbaceous cover of the revegetated area will be considered <br />adequate for final bond release if it is not less than 90% of the herbaceous cover as determined from <br />the reference areas with 90% statistical confidence utilizing a standard student’s statistical t-test <br />comparison of the means.” <br /> <br />During the June 2018 inspection, the Division observed three areas of heavy cheatgrass which is <br />classified as a List C noxious weed. The location of these areas were within reclamation parcels <br />EP050, EP051 and WP015. The perimeter of the cheatgrass concentrations were walked with GPS <br />and a rough area was measure for EP050 and EP051. The cheatgrass areas are approximately 0.22 <br />acres for EP050 and 0.96 acres for EP051. When comparing these cheatgrass concentrated areas to <br />the relative size of their associated reclamation parcel, the Division considers these measured areas <br />to not be representative. The cheatgrass areas consisted of less than 0.3% of the total area for <br />EP050 and 3.1% for EP051. Reclamation parcel WP015 was only visually inspected and due to the <br />size of WP015 (101.8 acres), the cheatgrass concentrated area was considered not representative of
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.