Laserfiche WebLink
Knight Piesold Knight Piesold and Co. <br /> C O N S U L T I N Cs 1999 Broadway, Suite 600 <br /> Denver, Colorado 80202-5706 USA <br /> Telephone: (303) 629-8788 <br /> Facsimile: (303)629-8789 <br /> October 8, 2018 <br /> Cripple Creek and Victor Gold Mining Co. (Newmont) KP Project No.: DV1 01-00408/03 <br /> 100 North 31d Street KP Doc. No.: DV-18-1131 <br /> PO Box 191 <br /> Victor, Colorado 80860 <br /> Attn: Environmental Department, Meg Burt, Senior Manager <br /> Subject: Cripple Creek and Victor Mine <br /> Stormwater Management Plan Evaluation — Review Findings, EMP 22 and ECOSA Facility <br /> Toe Berm Design Upgrades <br /> Revision 4 <br /> Dear Meg: <br /> This letter presents the findings of the Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP) infrastructure review <br /> performed by Knight Piesold and Co. (Knight Piesold) for Cripple Creek and Victor Gold Mining Co. <br /> (CC&V), a subsidiary of Newmont Mining Corporation (Newmont). Specifically, this revision addresses the <br /> comments received from the Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety (DRMS) on July 26, <br /> 2018, which are included as Attachment 1 of this document. <br /> The review was performed based on observations made during the site visit on February 20, 2018, <br /> information provided by CC&V, and analyses performed by Knight Piesold. The emphasis of the review <br /> was focused on the enhanced management practices (EMPs), or engineered stormwater management <br /> ponds, and the associated spillways and contributing diversion channels (DC). Specifically, the following <br /> aspects of the SWMP infrastructure were evaluated: <br /> • Facility layouts: Locations, alignments, profiles, and cross-section dimensions. <br /> • Design criteria: Recurrence interval storm events for conveyance and storage. <br /> • Hydrologic analyses: Stormwater peak flow rates and volumes. <br /> • Hydraulic analyses: As-built capacities and erosion protection measures. <br /> The analyses performed by Knight Piesold were used to evaluate if the existing SWMP infrastructure <br /> adheres to the design criteria. This evaluation compared the peak flows and runoff volumes estimated by <br /> Knight Piesold (based on the established design criteria) to the as-built hydraulic capacities. Where it was <br /> found that a structure is undersized (i.e., identified design gap), Knight Piesold provided an updated <br /> feasibility study (FS) level design to CC&V that adheres to the design criteria. <br /> The required design upgrades were largely presented to CC&V in a separate design report. However, this <br /> document presents the required design upgrades for the following structures for the stated reasons: <br /> • East Cresson/\/Vild Horse Overburden Storage Area (ECOSA) facility toe berm: Included in response to <br /> the DRMS comments received on July 26, 2018. <br /> • EMP 22, also known as the Chicago Tunnel Site Detention Pond: Included because CC&V committed <br /> to these upgrades as part of the Permit No. M-1980-244 Amendment 11 process with the DRMS. <br /> Management system cedr%d by <br /> BSI - <br /> ISO 9001-FS 5SW61 <br /> ISO 14001-EMS 585862 <br /> OHSAS 18001-OHS 58503 <br />