Laserfiche WebLink
Recharge flux within the radius of influence (W) was estimated based on annual precipitation <br /> (WRCC 2018) and inputs from irrigated agriculture (CSU 2009). Annual precipitation in the <br /> region averages 15.1 inches/year (WRCC 2018). With the majority of precipitation occurring <br /> during sporadic, high intensity thunderstorms, it was assumed that 20 percent contributes to <br /> alluvial groundwater recharge. The recommended average annual water need for grass pasture <br /> crops in the Longmont/Greeley area is about 26 inches/year (CSU 2009). Irrigation, therefore, <br /> must contribute 10.9 inches/year to make up for the precipitation deficit. Considering the <br /> soaking nature of irrigated agriculture, it was assumed that 50 percent of the irrigation water <br /> contributes to the aquifer recharge. <br /> To estimate the potential dewatering impacts, the radius of influence was assumed to extend to a <br /> point where analysis results showed an alluvial groundwater drawdown of approximately <br /> 20 percent of the saturated thickness or 3 feet. This assumption is also reasonable considering <br /> groundwater elevation and saturated thickness can vary up to several feet seasonally. <br /> Within the estimated radius of influence, obstructions will increase and decrease the affects of <br /> dewatering. To the northeast, the Cache la Poudre River borders the site boundary. It is <br /> assumed that the river is in direct connection with the alluvial groundwater and, therefore, <br /> continuous recharge from the river will significantly influence the affects of dewatering. Impacts <br /> from dewatering will not extend north or west of the river, and the radius of influence will be <br /> reduced immediately south and east of the river due to the increased recharge flux. <br /> Alluvial aquifer saturated thickness and recharge are very important parameters in the analytical <br /> solution. In addition to assumptions made estimating the saturated thickness and input from <br /> recharge, these two parameters also vary seasonally and from year to year. Values for the <br /> parameters, however, are used in the analytical solution based on annual averages. Therefore, <br /> variability in these parameters will make observed impacts from the analytical solution differ <br /> seasonally and year to year. Additionally, affects from obstructions such as seasonal recharge <br /> from the river and irrigation canals such as the Fort Collins Irrigation Canal Ditch are not <br /> considered in the analytical solution. Considering all assumptions and parameter variability, it <br /> needs to be noted that results of the analytical solution should only be taken as a rough <br /> approximation of potential dewatering impacts and alluvial groundwater elevation monitoring is <br /> recommended to evaluate actual groundwater impacts. <br /> For the Lamb Lakes dewatering analysis, it is assumed that only one lake will be dewatered at a <br /> time with each lake creating a circular pit with a radius of 600 feet. Based on available <br /> information and parameter assumptions, the unobstructed radius of influence was estimated to <br /> extend over 1300 feet beyond the outer-most cell wall with dewatering flows from the cells of <br /> almost 130 gallons per minute. However, if three feet of drawdaown from the existing <br /> groundwater surface is considered to be the significant affect, the significant radius of influence <br /> was estimated to be approximately 650 feet from the cell walls (Figure 3). Drawdown of the <br /> alluvial groundwater elevation is illustrated in Figure 4 and the spreadsheet analysis results are <br /> included in Appendix C. <br /> As discussed above, the drawdown affects will be reduced by the Cache la Poudre River <br /> recharge and drawdown affects will not extend north or west of the river. The result of these <br /> affects on the radius of influence has been estimated in Figure 4. Although Figure 4 presents an <br /> estimate of potential dewatering impacts, alluvial groundwater elevation monitoring is <br /> recommended to evaluate actual impacts. <br /> (blue ear'fh Page 8 of 12 <br /> SOLUliONS <br />