My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-10-16_PERMIT FILE - M2018039 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2018039
>
2018-10-16_PERMIT FILE - M2018039 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/4/2025 6:14:19 AM
Creation date
10/16/2018 1:47:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2018039
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
10/16/2018
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Blue Earth Solutions
To
DRMS
Email Name
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
173
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3.0 POTENTIAL DEWATERING IMPACTS <br /> To estimate potential impacts from mine dewatering operations, the steady-state two- <br /> dimensional analytical solution of Marinelli and Niccoli (2000) was used for each phase of the <br /> mine plan. The analytical solution estimates radial groundwater flow toward a circular pit and <br /> assumes that drawdown occurs within a homogeneous, isotropic aquifer of infinite extent. Other <br /> important assumptions include (1) groundwater flow is steady state, unconfined, horizontal, and <br /> radial, (2) recharge is uniformly distributed and captured within the radius of influence, (3) the <br /> aquifer extends significantly beyond the radius of influence, and (4) the base of the pit is <br /> coincident with the base of the aquifer and there is no flow through the pit bottom. Review of <br /> the site hydrogeologic characterization (Section 2) suggests that these assumptions are <br /> reasonably satisfied. Deviations from these assumptions are described in more detail below. <br /> The analytical solution for groundwater saturated thickness in the aquifer adjacent to a mine <br /> dewatering operation is given as: <br /> - <br /> h =FW+ ra r <br /> in - r —rp <br /> rp 2 <br /> where <br /> h is saturated thickness above the pit base at r(radial <br /> distance from pit center) [L], <br /> hp is saturated thickness above the pit base at rp(at <br /> the mine wall) [L], <br /> W is distributed recharge flux JUT], <br /> KI, is horizontal hydraulic conductivity of <br /> surrounding geologic materials [L/TJ. <br /> r; is radius of influence (maximum extent of the <br /> cone of depression) [L], <br /> r is radial distance from pit center IL1, <br /> rp is effective pit radius [L]. <br /> Given input values of hp, W, Kh, rp, and initial (pre-mining) saturated thickness above the pit <br /> base (h at ri), the radius of influence (ri) can be determined through iteration by setting r equal <br /> to ri. Once ri is determined, h can be calculated for any radial distance from the pit, and <br /> drawdown can be calculated as pre-mining h minus calculated h at r. <br /> Key parameters in the analysis include the alluvial aquifer saturated thickness at the pit wall <br /> prior to dewatering impacts, hydraulic conductivity (Kh), and recharge (W). Pre-mining aquifer <br /> characteristics were discussed previously in Section 2, including an alluvial groundwater <br /> saturated thickness of 15 feet (h at ri) and hydraulic conductivity of 30 feet/day (Kh). <br /> Additionally, it was assumed that the alluvial groundwater saturated thickness is drawn down <br /> to 2 feet at the pit wall (hp at rp) during dewatering. <br /> (blue earth Page 7 of 12 <br /> SOLUTIONS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.