My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-06-28_PERMIT FILE - M2018028
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2018028
>
2018-06-28_PERMIT FILE - M2018028
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2021 10:01:38 PM
Creation date
6/28/2018 4:21:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2018028
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
6/28/2018
Doc Name
Incompleteness Response
From
Thomas Zimmerman
To
DRMS
Email Name
TC1
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Environmental Effects <br /> Proposed Action <br /> Direct and Indirect Impacts: Water usage and impacts from the proposal would be two <br /> fold. First, the proposal would pump water out of the Arkansas River using a pump that would <br /> be capable of using approximately 150 gallons per minute. The water would then flow through a <br /> sluice draining into a settling basin before reentering the river. The material being worked is <br /> alluvial in nature and not expected to introduce any new or elevated levels of constituents into <br /> the river. The settling pond would keep most sediment from entering the river. The second <br /> impact would be the physical disturbance of the site. The removal of vegetation and soil <br /> disturbance leads to increased runoff and sediment transport If the site is not reclaimed <br /> properly, this impact could persist for a long period of time. This is mainly a concern during <br /> high intensity rain events as runoff could transport sediment into the river,however any <br /> precipitation could transport sediments into the river. The implementation of proper stormwater <br /> controls,interim reclamation and final reclamation are essential to mitigating this impact. <br /> 3.3.2 TIREATTMA ENDANGERED AND SENSITIVE SPECIES <br /> Affected Environment: <br /> The habitat type is primarily pinyon pine and juniper. Open areas of mountain grassland <br /> are interspersed throughout the area and mountain shrubs such as currant and mountain <br /> mahogany are abundant. Three sensitive species could occur in the area:peregrine falcon, <br /> golden eagle and bald eagle. The Arkansas River corridor contains numerous cliffs that are <br /> suitable for nesting peregrines and golden eagles. <br /> Bald eagles could be expected to occur along the Arkansas River during the winter <br /> months. Delisting of the bald eagle became effective August 8, 2007, however it is still <br /> protected by the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act and Migratory Bird Treaty Act. The <br /> Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act prohibits the take,possession, sale,purchase,barter, offer <br /> to sell,purchase,or barter, transport, export or import, of any bald or golden eagle, alive or dead, <br /> including any part,nest, or egg,unless allowed by permit(16U.S.0 668(a); 50 CFR 22). "Take" <br /> is defined as"pursue, shoot, shoot at,poison,wound,kill, capture,trap,collect, molest or <br /> disturb"a bald or golden eagle. The term "disturb"under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection <br /> Act was recently defined via a final rule published in the Federal Register on June 5,2007(72 <br /> Fed.Reg.31332). "Disturb"means to agitate or bother a bald or golden eagle to a degree that <br /> causes,or is likely to cause,based on the best scientific information available, 1)injury to an <br /> eagle,2) a decrease in its productivity,by substantially interfering with normal breeding, <br /> feeding, or sheltering behavior, or 3)nest abandonment, by substantially interfering with normal <br /> breeding, feeding, or sheltering behavior. <br /> Peregrine falcons could also be expected to forage along the river corridor during the <br /> breeding season. There are several breeding cliffs in the upper Arkansas River valley; however, <br /> there are no nesting sites in the vicinity of the project area. <br /> Proposed Action <br /> Direct and Indirect Impacts: Peregrine and Golden Eagles nest within the Royal Gorge <br /> and Bighorn Sheep Canyon and Bald Eagles use the river corridor in the winter; however, no <br /> known nest sites are located within two miles of the project area; therefore, impacts to these <br /> species is expected to be minimal. <br /> Protective/Mitigation Measures: None. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.