My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-06-28_PERMIT FILE - M2018028
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2018028
>
2018-06-28_PERMIT FILE - M2018028
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2021 10:01:38 PM
Creation date
6/28/2018 4:21:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2018028
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
6/28/2018
Doc Name
Incompleteness Response
From
Thomas Zimmerman
To
DRMS
Email Name
TC1
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Exhibit B—Site Description <br /> The mining claim is located on BLM property on the banks of the Arkansas River East of the private <br /> property of a local rafting company.The closest permanent man made structures belong to the Rafting <br /> Company(Kissack Investments, LLC.), and these structures are all located more than 200 feet from the <br /> mining area. <br /> Concerning description of soils,vegetation,water,and wildlife please reference the attached excerpts <br /> taken from the "Environmental Assessment El Rancho Bondo Mining Plan of Operations Modification" <br /> dated March 2015 (completed by the Bureau of Land Management).The complete Environmental <br /> Assessment will also be attached to this application in Exhibit F. <br /> 3.2.3 SOILS (includes a 5ndhie on standard_1) <br /> Affwted Environment: <br /> The proposed project area lies on a largely upland bench adjacent to the Arkansas River. <br /> Due to the small nature of the bench, the exact soil type has not been.mapped. Based on the <br /> current digging at the site,the soil appears to be relatively well developed with a well-defined A <br /> horizon that is approximately 4 inches deep and consists of a fine sandy loam. This is followed <br /> by a B horizon that is a well-developed sandy silt that is approximately S inches deep. These <br /> two layers are likely to be alluvium and/or eolian deposits. Below these upper soil layers is a <br /> deep alluvial deposit of poorly sorted cobbles,gravels and sands that is the target of the existing <br /> operation,as well as the proposed modification. The Proposed Action calls for separating and <br /> stockpiling topsoil until it is used for reclamation. Ultimately,the proponent is responsible for <br /> successful reclamation of the site showing that soil productivity is comparable to the pre-mining <br /> condition. A successful reclaimed site will be comparable to the pre-disturbed site as long as <br /> ecological processes are functioning within a normal range of variability and the native plant <br /> community meets the expected functional/structural groups and composition. <br /> These soils are well drained and generally dry with the water table being approximately <br /> at river level. Due to the sandy nature of the soil,it is highly susceptible to both wind and water <br /> erosion. <br /> 3-2-4 WATER(SURFACE AND GROUNDWATER.FLOODp'LATNSZ(Jiricludes a finding <br /> on standard 5) <br /> Affected> nvironment: <br /> The Proposed Action takes place on a bench directly adjacent to the Arkansas River. The <br /> lower toe of the project area is likely near the flood stake level of the river;however,floodplain <br /> mapping of the site is at a course scale and the exact flood level is difficult to determine. It is <br /> possible that the 100 year flood level is within the proposed area; however,due to the <br /> topography of the site it doesn't exhibit floodplain characteristics. Historic and present mining <br /> has cast material down on a frequently inundated lower bench and high flow has transported <br /> material from the site. <br /> Water quality in the Arkansas River at this location is good and is not identified as being <br /> impaired by the State of Colorado. Historically,the water quality in the river has been heavily <br /> impacted by heavy metals due to historic mining in the headwaters areas,mainly around <br /> Leadville. Over the last 30 years tremendous improvements have been made to improve the <br /> water quality throughout the watershed. Groundwater with the proposal is associated with the <br /> alluvial aquifer along the river. At this site,this aquifer is very narrow and is very closely <br /> hydrologically connected to the river. Essentially, near groundwater and surface water are <br /> identical in this location. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.