Laserfiche WebLink
Deep Cut LLC - 22 West Pit Page 2 <br /> Adequacy response 01 Permit # M-2017-032 <br /> After we talked about the scaling problems for the Exhibit A map you withdrew this <br /> question, so I prepared a second map labeled Map Exhibit B-1 Location Map that <br /> shows the location of the mine in relation to surrounding towns and features. <br /> Exhibit B— Index Map (Rule 6.4.2): <br /> 4) To better show the regional location of the affected land,please submit a replacement map that <br /> indicates the location of the nearest city, Rocky Ford, and labels the Arkansas River. <br /> I revised Map Exhibit B to show the mines location in relation to Rocky Ford and labeled <br /> the Arkansas River, CR 22 and HWY 50. <br /> Exhibit C — Pre-Mining and Mining Plan Map(s) of Affected Land (Rule 6.4.3): <br /> 5) Please submit replacement map(s) with the following corrections: <br /> a. Show the name and location of Co Rd 22. <br /> b. Show the owner's name,type of structure, and location of Co Rd 22 to the east, the ditch and <br /> fencing present to the north, the barbed wire fence present to the west, and the overhead electric lines <br /> and fencing present to the south. <br /> It appears that I left the improvements label layer turned off on this map which has been <br /> corrected. All of the structures are now labeled as on Map Exhibit C-1. I fixed the labels <br /> for the power line and the southern structures are now noted. I also added the Structure <br /> owner and list from Exhibit S to the map for reference. <br /> 6) Additionally, please provide the following clarifications regarding the two maps submitted in this <br /> exhibit: <br /> a. The Exhibit C 1 —Mining Plan Map indicates "Reclaimed—New/Existing" areas both inside and <br /> outside of the proposed permit boundary, colored green. Please provide clarification for why these <br /> areas are shown on the mining plan map, why one section is located outside of the proposed southern <br /> permit boundary, and if the existing reclaimed areas will be redisturbed by the operation. <br /> The C-1 Map is intended to show the area when partially mined and reclaimed. After <br /> looking at the printed version of the map, I realized that at this time in the life of the mine <br /> there will be no topsoil present to use on the above water slopes in that area. It should <br /> not have been colored light green from the pre-law dirt pile area west. Currently the north <br /> shore of the existing lake is reclaimed by grading and shaping only since there is no <br /> growth medium available until/unless operations move into the pre-law dirt pile area. I <br /> also included the pre-law concrete wash out area that was not on the original maps. <br /> On the south side, the colored area outside the permit area, was a mistake as it will NOT <br /> be redisturbed. I intended to show the very narrow band where the 2 lakes were <br /> connected. The area between the new lake area and the permit line was not redisturbed. <br /> That color of green should match the currently revegetated shore lines along the south <br /> and east side of the pre-law dirt pile area where it was not redisturbed. I fixed this and <br /> also found and fixed the county road label on this map. <br /> b. The Exhibit C1 —Mining Plan Map includes a cross-section at the top-right corner which appears to <br /> show a proposed grading plan for pond shorelines. Please provide a title for this cross-section. <br />