Laserfiche WebLink
Exhibit H Wildlife (cont) <br /> Copies of Sections from BLM Environmental Assessment for amendment area <br /> all migratory nongame birds that, without additional conservation actions, are likely to become <br /> candidates for listing under the Endangered Species Act(ESA) of 1973."Birds of Conservation <br /> Concern 2008 is the most recent effort to carry out this mandate. Bird species considered for the <br /> BCC include: <br /> • nongame birds <br /> ■ gamebirds without hunting seasons <br /> ■ subsistence-hunted nongame birds in Alaska <br /> • ESA candidate, proposed, and recently delisted species." <br /> Of the 28 species noted as having the potential to occur in the area, five are analyzed. The <br /> Brewer's sparrow and sage thrasher are likely to inhabit sagebrush shrublands near the project <br /> area. However, none of this habitat exists onsite and breeding activities of these two species are <br /> unlikely to be impacted. The pinyon jay is also apt to utilize the adjacent pinyon juniper stands <br /> for breeding and foraging. Pinyon-juniper is sparse on the actual expansion site,but densities in <br /> the drainages upslope could potentially support breeding habitat for the species. Disturbance <br /> from the expansion of the pit would be highly likely to inhibit this species from nesting in the <br /> immediate area. While the slopes above the pit expansion are steep, no suitable cliff nesting <br /> habitat occurs for the remaining two species; the peregrine falcon and golden eagle. These two <br /> species could forage in the project area,but no nests are recorded in the area and the action is <br /> unlikely to impact breeding of the two raptor species. <br /> 5.13.2. Environmental Consequences — Proposed Action <br /> The Proposed Action would impact one bird Species of Conservation Concern; the pinyon jay. <br /> Jays attempting to nest in the adjacent pinyon juniper stands within approximately '/z mile from <br /> the disturbance of pit expansion would not likely persist in the attempt. A GIS analysis by <br /> buffering the pit expansion boundary by 0.5 mile and determining the acres of suitable pinyon- <br /> juniper habitat(using 2015 NAIP aerial imagery) within this half mile "potential noise <br /> disturbance area" indicates 37 acres of potential nesting habitat impacted. Overall, this is a small <br /> amount compared to stands nearby; but an unknown number of potential nests would likely be <br /> impacted. The remainder of the pit has been in operation since 1974 (over 40 years), so these <br /> additional noise impacts are not expected to add any significant negative affect on pinyon jays. <br /> 5.13.3. Environmental Consequences — No Action Alternative <br /> The No Action Alternative would preclude expansion of the pit, meaning gravel operations are <br /> likely to cease onsite in the near future, since the existing pit is nearing the end of its useful life. <br /> The existing site would likely be reclaimed with the intent of restoring native vegetation. This <br /> would prove beneficial to migratory bird habitat, and remove noise impacts to the surrounding <br /> area. <br /> 5.13.4. Mitigation Measures <br /> Operations will occur during breeding season for migratory birds; no realistic mitigation would <br /> be practical to mitigate noise impacts and human activity on the site. <br /> DOI-BLM-CO-N020-2017-0034-EA 38 <br /> 17 <br />