Laserfiche WebLink
PM , <br /> Qn <br /> Conclusions and Recommendations <br /> The project design is in the preliminary stages, and impacts to biological resources, if any, are not yet known. <br /> Therefore, Pinyon recommends the following: <br /> • Threatened and Endangered species and their habitat does not occur in the study area. Therefore, the <br /> project will have no effect on federally listed species. No further coordination with the USFWS is <br /> anticipated. <br /> • Potential raptor and migratory bird nesting habitat was identified in the study area.The Migratory Bird <br /> Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act(BGEPA) are both administered by <br /> the USFWS and protect nesting migratory birds and Bald and Gold Eagles respectively. If construction <br /> activities occur during the nesting season (generally April I —August 31; although, raptors may nest as <br /> early as February), Pinyon recommends conducting pre-construction nest surveys. Depending on the <br /> outcome of the surveys, coordination with the USFWS or Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) may <br /> be required. Due to the potential for MBTA constraints, it is recommended that the developer follow <br /> MBTA nest survey guidelines as outlined by CPW during the nesting season (CPW,2008) (see included <br /> attachment). <br /> • Potential jurisdictional WUS, including wetlands, were identified in the study area. The wetland <br /> delineation described in this memo is not a formal wetland delineation. As such, the data and results <br /> presented within this memo are for planning and avoidance purposes only and are not suitable for use <br /> in permitting documents. If project activities avoid all open waters and wetlands, the project is not <br /> likely to have impacts on theses resources. Pinyon recommends that formal wetland delineations are <br /> conducted as described in the USACE Wetland Delineation Manual and a Section 404 permit is <br /> obtained for any impacts to jurisdictional WUS, including wetlands, before any ground disturbance or <br /> fill activities occur (Environmental Laboratory, 1987; USACE, 2010). <br /> • If impacts to jurisdictional WUS, including wetlands, are anticipated from project activities, wetland <br /> impacts should be quantified. If impacts to WUS are less than 0.5 acre, it is anticipated that the project <br /> could be permitted under a USACE Nationwide Permit. An Individual Permit generally is required <br /> where impacts exceed 0.5 acre. However, other specific components of a project could trigger an <br /> Individual Permit (e.g., river channel realignment, construction of a drop structure, project type). An <br /> Individual Permit is typically a more difficult permit to obtain, because it requires Public Notice, an <br /> evaluation of alternatives, and more comprehensive mitigation planning. Only the USACE has the <br /> authority to make final determinations regarding jurisdiction, permitting, and mitigation. <br /> Limitations <br /> This memo was prepared by Pinyon, at the request of and for the sole benefit of Civil Resources, or any entity <br /> controlling, controlled by, or under common control with Civil Resources. The conclusions and <br /> recommendations offered in this report are based on the data obtained from a limited number of samples, <br /> within a prescribed study area as described in the text. Soil, hydrologic, vegetation, biological and ecological <br /> conditions typically vary even over short distances, by season, by elevation, and by meteorological conditions. <br /> Thus, the nature and extent of variations outside this biological investigation may not become evident except <br /> through further investigation. It is possible that ecological conditions may change from those observed, <br /> particularly over time. <br /> Biological Resources Technical Memorandum <br /> Hunt Slurry Wall Proposed Alignment <br /> April 23, 2018 6 <br />