Laserfiche WebLink
RULE 4 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS <br />Where necessary, the mean, variance and number of observations for the premine and reference area data <br />were used to perform t-tests on the cover and production data to insure that there were no significant <br />differences, at the 90% level of confidence, between the sets of cover data and production data. <br />A copy of the transect data summaries for cover, production and woody plant density can be found in <br />Exhibit 10, Vegetation Information. <br />During the summer of 1980, when the reference areas were chosen, the final mine plan had not been <br />completed and, the sagebrush reference area was inadvertently located within the area to be mined. Since <br />the reference area is to remain undisturbed during the life of the mining- operation to insure that <br />reclamation success criteria can be measured after final reclamation, another suitable sagebrush reference <br />area was chosen. <br />Since the initial sagebrush reference area had been shown to be statistically comparable to the premine <br />sagebrush community, Colowyo located another sagebrush reference area which was statistically <br />comparable to the existing reference area. This new (1981) reference area was intensively sampled for <br />herbaceous cover and production, using the same sampling methodologies and statistical tests that were <br />used to compare the present reference area to the premine area. On August 21, 1981 Colowyo submitted <br />revised vegetative data summarizing the results of the selection of an alternative sagebrush reference area. <br />Both the new (1981) sagebrush reference area and old sagebrush reference area were intensively sampled <br />for herbaceous cover and production using the same methodologies and statistical tests as used on all <br />previous vegetative sampling programs with the following two exceptions. For the purpose of sample <br />adequacy, the 90% confidence level has been attained for cover and production, whereas, in the past the <br />80% confidence level had been attained. For production sampling, a larger 60cm. x 60cm. frame was <br />used rather than the 30cm. x 60cm. frame used to gather baseline production data for the original permit <br />application. The use of a larger frame reduced the sampling variance, thus reducing the numbers of <br />samples needed to achieve sample adequacy. <br />For the locations of the current (1981) Sagebrush Reference Area, (1980) Mountain Shrub Reference <br />Area, and (1984) Aspen Reference Area, refer to Map 3, Regional Vegetation. The Sagebrush Reference <br />Area is located north of the office / warehouse complex in the west 1/2 of Section 34, T4N R93W. The <br />Mountain Shrub Reference Area is located on the crest and both east and west slopes of a ridge west of <br />West Pit in the NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 8 and the NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 9, T4N <br />R93W. The Aspen Reference Area is located approximately 4 miles to the SSW of the South Taylor Area <br />in the SE 1/4 of Section 1, T2N R94W and the SW 1/4 of Section 6, T2N R93W. <br />Currently the reference areas are located in an area where grazing can be managed in accordance with the <br />approved postmining land use. <br />Comparisons of weighted averages between reference areas and revegetated areas under Subsection <br />4.15.7(4) (b) and Subsection 4.15.11 may be utilized to determine revegetation success. Similar <br />methodologies and statistical tests used to compare premine and reference areas will be used to compare <br />reference areas and revegetated areas. For weighted comparisons of original permit area revegetation <br />(grazinglands), reclaimed area data will be compared against 55% Mountain Shrub Reference Area and <br />45% Sagebrush Reference Area data. However, some comparisons may be made directly against a single <br />reference area (e.g., Sagebrush Reference Area). In this regard, any sagebrush steppe community that <br />evolves in the reclaimed area will be directly compared against the 1981 sagebrush reference area. For <br />weighted comparisons of South Taylor revegetation, reclaimed area data will be compared against 52% of <br />the 1980 Mountain Shrub Reference Area, 25% of the 1981 Sagebrush Reference Area, and 23% of the <br />1984 Aspen Woodland Reference Area data. <br />Rule 4 Performance Standards 4-55 Revision Date: 1/31/18 <br />Revision No.: TR -119 <br />