My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-04-09_REVISION - C2009087
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C2009087
>
2018-04-09_REVISION - C2009087
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2018 10:04:55 AM
Creation date
4/10/2018 8:19:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2009087
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
4/9/2018
Doc Name
Adequacy Review
From
Brock Bowles
To
Tabetha Lynch
Type & Sequence
SL4
Email Name
TNL
BFB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COLORADO <br />Division of Reclamation, <br />j&7 Mining and Safety <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />April 9, 2018 <br />To: Tabetha Lynch <br />From: Brock Bowles <br />RE: Peabody Sage Creek Mine, C-2009-087 <br />Bond Release No. 4 (SL -4) <br />I have finished my review of the Peabody Sage Creek bond release application no. 4. A <br />summary of each reclamation standard is included below for inclusion into the findings <br />document. <br />Cover <br />Cover data was collected during the 2012 and 2014 growing seasons for the bond release and <br />reference areas. Sample adequacy was achieved for cover in both the bond release and reference <br />areas for 2012 and 2014. The cover reclamation standard uses a weighted average of the two <br />reference areas. The mountain brush area contributes 83% and the sagebrush area contributes 17% <br />to the standard. A complete description of determining revegetation success is detailed in Section <br />2.05.4 of the permit starting on page 47 and in the SL -4 application. <br />The allowable plant cover in 2012 was 32.4% which exceeded the reclamation standard of 21.7% in <br />a direct comparison test. The allowable plant cover in 2014 was 47.09% which was less than the <br />reclamation standard of 48.1 %. When the reclamation standard is not achieved in a direct comparison <br />test but sample adequacy is achieved, the standard null hypothesis test described in Rule 4.15.11(2)(b) <br />is used to demonstrate revegetation success. The statistical demonstration supported the hypothesis <br />of `no difference' and the revegetation was deemed successful. The cover standard was <br />demonstrated to be successful for both 2012 and 2014. <br />Production <br />Production data was collected during the 2012 and 2014 growing seasons for the bond release and <br />reference areas. Sample adequacy was not achieved in the reclamation areas in 2102 and 2014. Rule <br />4.15.11(2)(c) is applied when the reclamation standard is achieved but sample adequacy is not met. <br />The production reclamation standard uses a weighted average of the two reference areas. The <br />mountain brush area contributes 83% and the sagebrush area contributes 17% to the standard. <br />The allowable herbaceous production in 2012 was 847.6 lbs/ac which exceeded the reclamation <br />standard of 230.1 lbs/ac. Sample adequacy was not achieved in the reclamation areas in 2012 so <br />fly.. C <br />H <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215, Denver, CO 80203 P 303.866.3567 F 303.832.8106 http://mining.state.co.us I <br />John W. Hickenlooper, Governor I Mike King, Executive Director I Virginia Brannon, Director * r 1876 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.