Laserfiche WebLink
Data Recovery Repot for Three Sites at the Collom Project Colowyo Coal Company <br />2.2 Paleoindian Era <br />The Paleoindian Era dates from 11,500 to 6,400 B.C. Material evidence dating to this era is <br />traditionally been interpreted as a megafauna hunting -centric adaptation during the terminal <br />phases of the Pleistocene into the early Holocene (Reed and Metcalf 1999). Paleoindian bands <br />are argued to have been highly mobile hunter -gatherers and their food economy was based on <br />the availability of big game that ranged across a broad landscape (Simms 2008). In western <br />Colorado, Paleoindian Era landscape utilization is not well known and largely speculated upon <br />based on archaeological findings from outside the region. Paleoindian archaeological sites are <br />few and far between compared to other parts of Colorado. The material cultural that has been <br />recovered is limited to isolated Paleoindian projectile point types and/or surface scatters of varying <br />densities of debitage with associated Paleoindian projectile point types. <br />2.3 Archaic Era <br />The Archaic Era dates from approximately 6,400 to 400 B.C. Reed (1984) originally described the <br />Archaic Era as adaptively like the Paleoindian's highly mobile hunter -gatherers but technologically <br />adapted to the new Holocene climate. The Era's climatic is argued to have been different from <br />the preceding and succeeding eras due to the Altithermal climatic event (Bently 1983). The <br />original Archaic Era conceptualizations have changed in the last few decades as the result of a <br />significant increase in data resulting from cultural resource management projects completed <br />within the region (Larson and Francis 1997). Recent climatic reconstructions based on regional <br />evidence suggest that the classically defined persistent hot and dry Altithermal climatic event did <br />not even occur in the upper Colorado River Basin. Currently, the era is generally described as a <br />period of shifting smaller scale hot and cold, and and moist climatic shifts that necessitated <br />changes in hunting and gathering subsistence practices and landscape use. Fluctuations in the <br />strength and duration of the summer monsoon season appears to have had a greater impact on <br />the local environment than the previously defined broader climatic trends. The appearance of <br />groundstone technology is argued to reflect the human population adaptive shift toward broader <br />based foraging that focused on plant resources and small game hunting as compared to the <br />Paleoindian Era (Reed and Metcalf 1999). Pit house and projectile point discoveries also <br />challenge original theories that the region was lightly populated by groups coming from <br />surrounding cultural areas and engaging in logistical resource exploitation. The findings have led <br />several researchers to propose a more continuous, more sedentary and region -specific <br />adaptation for northern Colorado River Basin specifically and the Intermountain West generally <br />(Black 1991; Larson and Francis 1997; and Stiger 2001). <br />Overall, the region's Archaic Era sites have most frequently been identified along major <br />drainages, associated terraces, and other landforms in open basin settings. Utilization of foothill <br />and mountain areas appear to vary in intensity and coincide with climatic conditions that made <br />higher elevation environments more favorable to human habitation (Reed and Metcalf 1999). Pit <br />features proliferate and diversify during this period. Pit types defined to date include shallow <br />stained soil basins, deep stained soil basins, rock and heat -altered rock filled basins, bell shaped <br />basins, and rock or slab -lined basins (Stiger 2001). Projectile point types are distinct from and <br />more diverse compared to the previous Paleoindian or future Formative eras with varieties <br />including corner -notched, side -notched, lanceolate, and tri -notched. Archaeologists have not <br />been able to develop a comprehensive point type chronology based on regional data and the <br />reasons for such spatial, temporal and morphological point diversity during this era are still <br />debated (Reed and Metcalf 1999). <br />Tetra Tech February 2018 <br />