My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-02-08_PERMIT FILE - C2010089 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C2010089
>
2018-02-08_PERMIT FILE - C2010089 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2018 8:27:59 AM
Creation date
3/22/2018 8:26:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010089
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
2/8/2018
Doc Name
Revegetation Plan
Section_Exhibit Name
Section 2.05.4(2)(e)
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
NHN owns the Dryland Pasture reference area and controls all of the management aspects of this <br />site. The reference area will be protected from domestic livestock grazing. Wildlife (deer, elk) <br />winter grazing will still be allowed, as is on the NHN Dryland Pasture reclamation areas. <br />4.0 Revegetation Success Criteria and Statistical Procedures <br />4.1 Irrigated Pasture/Cropland <br />The Garvey Property requires a special performance criterion for production to meet its post - <br />mining land use of Irrigated Pasture/Cropland because the land owner has requested an alfalfa <br />field. While this revegetation still would be considered an irrigated pasture, using the established <br />Irrigated Pasture Reference Area or baseline data, which are both comprised primarily of grasses, <br />seems inappropriate for the production success comparison. On the other hand, ground cover is <br />still appropriate to compare with the baseline data because ground cover primarily serves to <br />demonstrate erosion protection. <br />Production Success Criterion <br />The production success criterion for the Garvey Property will be derived from U.S. Department <br />of Agriculture - National Agricultural Statistics Service(https://quickstats.nass.usda.gov/), which <br />provides annual yields by county and commodity. Success comparison will occur against either <br />the Montrose County current annual alfalfa yield or the long term average (if the annual data is <br />not available). The following table displays the annual alfalfa yields for Montrose County for the <br />last 20 years (1997-2016). The resulting long term average is 3.41 air dry tons per acre. <br />Montrose Countv Alfalfa Yields (USDA - National Agricultural Statistics Service) <br />Year <br />Tons per Acre <br />Year <br />Tons per Acre <br />Year <br />Tons per Acre <br />Year <br />Tons per Acre <br />1997 <br />3.85 <br />2002 <br />3.15 <br />2007 <br />3.60 <br />2012 <br />3.35 <br />1998 <br />3.85 <br />2003 <br />3.70 <br />2008 <br />2.75 <br />2013 <br />2.65 <br />1999 <br />3.75 <br />2004 <br />3.50 <br />2009 <br />3.65 <br />2014 <br />2.45 <br />2000 <br />3.40 <br />2005 <br />3.60 <br />2010 <br />2.80 <br />2015 <br />3.55 <br />2001 <br />3.60 <br />2006 <br />4.10 <br />2011 <br />3.40 <br />2016 <br />3.40 <br />Once the alfalfa yield (current annual or long term average) is obtained from the USDA, the <br />value needs to be discounted to only consider the first cut of alfalfa (success testing will occur <br />immediately prior to the first cut). A Colorado State University Extension study evaluated forage <br />yields of 20 alfalfa varieties at the Southwestern Colorado Research Center at Yellow Jacket, <br />Colorado in 1996-1999 (Colorado Alfalfa Variety Performance Results) and found that the first, <br />second, and third cut yielded 2.14, 1.87, and 1.00 tons per acre, respectively. Therefore, the first <br />cut accounts for 42.7% (2.14/5.01) of the annual yield. For example, the long term average yield <br />(3.41 air dry tons per acre) is multiplied by the first cut percentage (42.7%) to provide an <br />approved standard (1.45 air dry tons per acre) for revegetation success testing to occur <br />immediately before the first cut. A similar process would occur if current annual yields are used. <br />In accordance with Rule 4.15.8(4), herbaceous production of the revegetated area shall be <br />considered acceptable if the revegetated area production is not less than 90% of the approved <br />standard using approved statistical testing and demonstration techniques. <br />Section 2.05.4(2)(e) Page 8 of 14 January 2018 (PR -02) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.