My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-01-23_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981041
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981041
>
2018-01-23_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981041
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2018 1:45:42 PM
Creation date
1/23/2018 1:44:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981041
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
1/23/2018
Doc Name Note
For RN7
Doc Name
Proposed Decision and Findings of Compliance
From
DRMS
To
Snowcap Coal Company, Inc
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Email Name
JHB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> 42 C1981-041 RN7 findings <br />All Refuse disposal piles; RSRDA, CRDA-1 and CRDA-2 have previously been <br />approved for Phase III bond release. CRDA-1 and CRDA-2 have been removed from <br />the permit area with the approval of TR-70. <br /> <br />V. Sealing of Drilled Holes and Underground Openings <br /> <br />The method for sealing portals is depicted in Permit Figure 14-2. The South Mine <br />Portals have been sealed with a 24” thick concrete seal, and will be backfilled with <br />approximately 100 feet of dirt backfill extending out from the concrete seals. An <br />underdrain will be installed in conjunction with final backfilling to drain portal area <br />seepage away from the portal backfill. Other mine area portal openings were <br />backfilled with a minimum of 25 feet of incombustible backfill. Long term mine <br />discharge (post reclamation) from the Roadside South Mine will be from a gravity <br />discharge pipe installed by angled drilling in the vicinity of the North Decline area <br />(Outfall 016); a back-up discharge system is provided by a portal drain installed in the <br />seal of the reclaimed Northwest Intake Portal, which allows discharge through CDPS <br />Outfall 002 via siphon tubes. Outfall 002 would only be used in the event of <br />malfunction of Outfall 016. Due to the orientation of the North Mine workings, which <br />slope away from the portal and river, and due to the elevation of the portal which is <br />above the recovered groundwater elevation, no surface discharge from the North <br />Portal Mine is projected following reclamation, and thus no provisions were made for <br />discharge from the North Mine following reclamation. <br /> <br />Exploration drill holes, boreholes, or wells not completed in an aquifer will be sealed <br />by replacing cuttings in the hole and placing a cement plug in the top of the hole from <br />ten feet down to within three feet of the ground surface. The South Fan shaft was <br />sealed in this manner in the fall of 2000. <br /> <br />If a hole is completed in an aquifer, it will be sealed by placing an approved cement <br />or sealant in the hole from the bottom to within ten feet of the ground surface, a cement <br />plug will be placed in the upper ten feet. <br /> <br />Figure 14-2 illustrates typical permanent mine seals, and Figure 14-3 depicts a typical <br />“dry hole” permanent drill hole seal. <br /> <br />In 2014 a landowner directed water from a ditch to an area of north of the “Carey pit” <br />located in Township 10 South, Range 98 West, Section 34, and South of the sealed <br />Roadside South Portals. The water “disappeared” into the ground at a rate faster than <br />would be expected with normal infiltration. In response to the disappearance of the <br />water at this point, flow was noted at the French drain at the South Portals. Once the <br />water applied in Section 34 was stopped, flow from the French drain slowed and <br />eventually stopped. Investigation of Section 34 found that an air shaft had existed in <br />the area previously that had been sealed. No records or documentation were located <br />to confirm how or when this air shaft had been sealed. SCC conducted a study of the <br />air shaft vicinity to narrow down the locale of the suspected hydrologic <br />communication between the surface and underground workings. As a result of the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.