Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Elliott R. Russell <br /> January 4,2018 <br /> Page 4 <br /> Plan,profile, cross sections, and details of the bi-directional spillway/rundown have been <br /> added to Sheet 11 of the revised plan set attached in Appendix A. A plan and profile of <br /> the swale tie-in is shown on Sheet 10. <br /> 21. Within the September 2017 Flood Analysis and Flood Control Plan (Appendix D), the <br /> Operator states armoring the reservoir slope upstream of the spillway is not required <br /> because any inflow to the reservoir through the spillway that results in head cutting and <br /> slope failure would only cause damage to property owned by the landowner. In <br /> accordance with 3.1.6(3), all surface areas of the affected land shall be stabilized and <br /> protected as to effectively control erosion. Additionally, a head cut would compromise <br /> the spillway structure and the slurry wall. Please provide a demonstration that the <br /> reservoir side slope will remain stable as flood waters flow into the reservoir from the <br /> spillway or revise the plan to include appropriate rip-rap, a concrete apron, or other <br /> erosion control measures on the reservoir side slope below the spillway. Erosion control <br /> measures should be depicted on the cross-section discussed in Adequacy Review Item <br /> #20. <br /> The RCC spillway channel described in D&A's response to Comment No. 18 will <br /> extend down to the toe of the reservoir slope. A horizontal concrete apron at the bottom <br /> of the rundown will provide protection for the toe. A stilling basin is not necessary <br /> because the reservoir bottom is in hard Pierre Shale bedrock, so erosion downstream of <br /> the apron will be minimal and will not compromise the apron's stability. This RCC <br /> spillway/rundown has been added to Sheet 11 of the revised plan set shown in Appendix <br /> A. <br /> 22.In response to Adequacy Review Item#10, the Operator states that if groundwater <br /> mounding exceed two feet, a perforated drain pipe would be installed to restore <br /> groundwater levels to less than two feet of mounding. To demonstrate the mitigation <br /> measure is feasibly and can be installed entirely within the affected lands,please provide <br /> the conceptual plans for a drain pipe and commit to, in the event groundwater mounding <br /> exceeds two feet, submitting the detailed mitigation plans for review and approval by the <br /> Division through the Technical Revision process.Alternatively, the Operator may submit <br /> these details for review and approval during the TR-04 process whereby, in the event <br /> groundwater mounding exceeds two feet, the Operator shall notify the Division and <br /> immediately implement the approved plan. <br /> See revised Appendix E. <br /> 23. The proposed groundwater mounding monitoring plan utilizes Well I (Permit No. <br /> 279124), which is located 200 feet west of the permit boundary on the neighboring <br /> property. This well is not owned by the Operator nor the mine site landowner, and <br /> therefore is not safeguarded through the life of mine. To ensure there are no adverse <br /> impacts to off-site groundwater users, the Division will require an addition monitoring <br />