Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2 of 9 <br />North Fork Farmers Ditch Culvert Inspection <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />occurring. The length of pipe that is in the highest deteriorated condition is approximately 100 feet in <br />length. <br /> <br />The bottom of the culvert remains settled, holding over a foot of standing water, approximately 100 feet <br />from the eastern end. Around this location, the culvert invert begins to slope as it was probably originally <br />intended and is in good shape. The eastern end of the culvert has an entrance apron that is in fair <br />condition with no major erosion present. <br /> <br />It appears that the portion of the culvert under the detention area has settled, likely due to the presence of <br />water above during storm events and the extra weight of the water on top of and within the overburden <br />soil. The settling has caused a portion of the culvert to hold standing water, which is known to reduce the <br />lifespan of culverts. The pipe failure observed was near the standing water line and appears to be a direct <br />result of that water during the irrigation off-season. <br /> <br /> <br />Culvert Ratings (Load and Condition) <br />CDOT and other state departments of transportation typically use AASHTO Load and Resistance Factor <br />Rating (LRFR) to determine the safe operating loads for flexible culverts. CDOT has not developed <br />software for the purposes of rating flexible culverts, so we have used the State of Ohio’s rating tool, <br />which mimics the AASHTO requirements that are the basis for both rating programs. <br /> <br />We performed two rating scenarios based on the sections of pipe that are in good condition and for the <br />section of pipe that is failing. The results of the rating program are attached to this letter. As expected, <br />rating of the culvert sections in good condition results in no posting recommendations for the culvert, <br />meaning it is operating at full load capacity. The rating of the pipe section that shows sign of failure <br />results in the following load posting recommendations: <br /> <br />Recommended Load Posting Sign <br /> <br />WEIGHT LIMIT <br />AXLES 2 3 T <br />3 4 T <br />4 4 T <br />5 5 T <br />6+ 5 T <br /> <br />The rating results require some qualifications due to the location of this culvert. First, the culvert is on <br />private land and is not subjected to repeated highway loading scenarios as is assumed for highway <br />culverts. <br /> <br />Second, the section of culvert that the recommended loads above apply to is not under a roadway. This <br />rating applies to the section of pipe that was observed under the detention area. <br /> <br />Third, the load rating above is in comparison to a full operating 2-axle vehicle of 15 tons. <br /> <br />A second rating system that can be used is that of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). It uses <br />a matrix for rating the overall condition of a culvert. Using the FHWA matrix, our rating for each of the <br />four criteria is as follows based on the most deteriorated section of pipe: <br /> <br />Criteria Rating Description