My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-01-03_REVISION - C1994082 (29)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1994082
>
2018-01-03_REVISION - C1994082 (29)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/4/2018 9:54:48 AM
Creation date
1/4/2018 8:21:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/3/2018
Doc Name
Proposed Decision and Findings of Compliance
From
DRMS
To
Seneca Property LLC
Type & Sequence
RN4
Email Name
JDM
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
be. <br />Land management information and farm productivity values for the hayfield in Section <br />18 were provided. The field in Section 18 is the smallest of three fields managed by the <br />Valora family as part of a limited sheep ranching operation. Dominant grass species in <br />the field are Smooth Brome and bluegrass. It produces one hay cutting per year at a <br />maximum rate of 2 tons/acre for a maximum production of 20 tons/year. The maximum <br />annual production from the total ranching operation is 150 tons. The field in Section 18 <br />provides 13% of the total productivity. The estimated worst-case loss in productivity is <br />2.8% as shown on Table 17-17a of the permit application. Crop reductions were based <br />on the formula presented in the Material Damage Assessment Process Pertaining to <br />Alluvial Valley Floors, Surface Water, Ground Water and Subsidence at Coal Mines <br />(January, 1988). As referenced in this document, less than a 3% reduction is considered <br />insignificant. <br />The Division finds that activities proposed by Seneca Property, LLC will not interrupt, <br />discontinue or preclude farming on the alluvial valley floors in the Sage Creek <br />Reservoir Site that are irrigated or naturally sub -irrigated. The field in Section 13 is <br />undeveloped rangeland, which is not significant to farming, and the field in Section 18 <br />provides negligible support for the farm's agricultural production. (4.24.3(1) and <br />2.06.8(5)(a)(i)). <br />The proposed activities will not materially damage the quantity or quality of water in the <br />surface or ground water system described above, because the lands are of such small <br />acreage as to be of negligible impact on the farm's agricultural production. (4.24.3(3) <br />and 2.06.8(5)(a)(ii)). <br />The proposed activities will comply with the requirement of the Act and the regulations <br />with respect to alluvial valley floors (2.06.8(5)(a)(iii)). <br />Surface coal mining and reclamation operations will be conducted to preserve the <br />essential hydrologic functions of alluvial floors outside the permit area. (4.24.2) <br />An environmental monitoring system was installed, maintained, and operated by the <br />permittee on all alluvial valley floors during surface coal mining and reclamation <br />operations and will continue until all bonds are released in accordance with Rule 3. <br />Sage Creek "Flood Irrigated Alfalfa Fields" <br />The Yoast permit application package indicates the presence of approximately 86 acres <br />of flood irrigated alfalfa hay along Sage Creek in Section 30. Five to ten acres of alfalfa <br />were flood irrigated in this field from 1988-1992. The field was irrigated by means of <br />pipes spreading water from a small reservoir near Sage Creek. The reservoir does not <br />currently impound water because the dam is breached. <br />The field was converted to dryland wheat for a number of reasons. Water availability <br />35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.